Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mr. Weiner and the Elusive Truth(Influential New York Times Editorial)
New York Times ^ | July 23, 2013 | DAVID W. CHEN and JAVIER C. HERNÁNDEZ

Posted on 07/24/2013 12:07:56 AM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: kabumpo

Oh, once again i am reminded of why i moved out of my out of my native land- expensive, dirty, full of ignoramuses-who -thinn-they-run-the - center-of -the - universe but can’t manage to hold onto the wonderful city my forefathers helped put together in the face of too much money and a handful of Muz B and al q operatives ‘oh ues mr weiner, you can bring you can show your penis to the world AND bring the mus bro hood into the first lady spot. Yes whatever you want. We are NYers. We dont care. We will fight for the right to correct people when we can suspect them of being wrong on on minute technocalities, but we have no stomach for keeping muzzies out of leadership


41 posted on 07/24/2013 6:51:32 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

Well Huma works for Hillary!, and Hillary! has a lot of experience when it comes to philandering husbands.

So she probably told Huma to always “stand by your man”, no matter how humiliating and embarrassing it was. THAT was/is her ticket to fame, after all. Despite all of Bill’s lewd acts and affairs, by standing by him, even invoking a “vast, right-wing conspiracy”, ultimately gave Hillary! a senate seat, a cabinet position and a chance at the presidency in 2016. I imagine Huma wants to follow her “leadership”.


42 posted on 07/24/2013 7:03:48 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stanne
Well, they aalso used this word (bolded):

A Web site called The Dirty had another woman’s story, another round of sex texts, and another picture of Mr. Weiner’s penis.

So in fairness, they were not prudes there.

43 posted on 07/24/2013 7:09:10 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
A Web site called The Dirty had another woman’s story, another round of sex texts, and another picture of Mr. Weiner’s penis.

Please, please can we call it a "tallywhacker"? Penis is so ppp... penis is so personal.

44 posted on 07/24/2013 7:13:06 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Whatever.


45 posted on 07/24/2013 7:59:45 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: stanne

LOL!

Well who peed in your corn flakes this morning?


46 posted on 07/24/2013 9:03:46 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

By all means, let’s be fair to the NYT

They know most readers stop at paragraph 1

Weiner needs to be gone as well as his weird wife whose motives are questionable at best

As i write Rush is saying this guy is reprehensible and leave it to the little group of misogynists on this site to drag the decent people on this site into debating over crotches peeing in cornflakes eyc

The country is in a cultural tailspin and a couple of fr sophomorons want to debate in fairness to weiner and the nyt

Eeeyuk!


47 posted on 07/24/2013 9:14:58 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

By all means, let’s be fair to the NYT

They know most readers stop at paragraph 1

Weiner needs to be gone as well as his weird wife whose motives are questionable at best

As i write Rush is saying this guy is reprehensible and leave it to the little group of misogynists on this site to drag the decent people on this site into debating over crotches peeing in cornflakes eyc

The country is in a cultural tailspin and a couple of fr sophomorons want to debate in fairness to weiner and the nyt

Eeeyuk!


48 posted on 07/24/2013 9:21:48 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yes, in the small, it is only his personal life.

However, I’m not sure this guy could reasonably be trusted to function responsibly in a management position, in charge of other managers including a HR director and female secretaries. In this economy though I am sure there are many who would, if he were in charge of the city, just hold their noses, work for the guy, and hope for the best.

Perhaps the issue is that Bill Clinton blazed a trail of public office sexual impropriety and perjury on Weiner’s behalf. At least, this seems likely to provide at least part of the rationalization for Weiner remaining in the mayor race.


49 posted on 07/24/2013 10:13:25 AM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

You know nothing about me or my activities, so it seems the height of arrogance and stupidity for you to opine on what I care about.


50 posted on 07/24/2013 2:57:01 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

I know that you took the time and effort to argue with me in favor of the New York times and their coddled, reprehensible anthony Weiner who should be hiding in disgrace and not parading around running for mayor with his security risk of a wife, according to her connections, her being top staffer in hillary’s Benghazi torn State dept and according to cong. M. Bachman

And that is enough for me to comment as i died

Care to defend these people any more?


51 posted on 07/24/2013 3:12:03 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Whoops - as i did


52 posted on 07/24/2013 3:13:28 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: stanne
They use the term, crotch? It’s a lie. They have a dictionary. They’ve seen the photos.

In the very next sentence, they say "another picture of Mr. Weiner’s penis."

53 posted on 07/24/2013 4:19:36 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

He needs to go and they need to help

No one in their eight mind will read beyond the initial description and they know it

But, you know, if you need to defend these people from little old me, these muz apologists


54 posted on 07/24/2013 4:33:43 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Right mind


55 posted on 07/24/2013 4:35:59 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I never defended them for one minute, even as a joke, and I don’t know where you got the idea that I did. Perhaps you are confused about to whom you are writing.


56 posted on 07/25/2013 4:36:34 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Huma: “no more Wiener!”


57 posted on 07/25/2013 4:42:38 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson