Well said.
Breitbart and theBlaze currently have some high visibility coverage of the Reggie Love interview comments about playing cards during the Bin Laden raid. Of course neither of the sites bothers to mention the discrepancy about Obama “finding” his birth certificate.
I attempted to post comments to both sites, but oddly those comments appear to have been lost to moderation. Here’s the one I attempted to post to the brief article by Awr Hawkins at breitbart.com:
How convenient that when Breitbart’s team reviewed this Reggie Love interview video, no one happened to notice any problems with Love’s personal eyewitness account of being there when Barack Obama “found” his long-misplaced birth certificate. In the interview, Mr. Love uses language that is curiously difficult to reconcile with the account from White House and that of the Hawaii Health Director Loretta Fuddy. Team Obama’s official line, which has been swallowed wholesale by Breitbart.com since day one, is that Obama never found a copy of his Birth Certificate, but rather was forced to specially request that Fuddy and Alvin T. Onaka make a policy exception in order to avail a new certified copy for hand delivery to the White House by Mr. Obama’s lawyer, Judith Corley.
Since Breitbart.com continues apparently to be convinced the Obama administration has been upright and honest about the birth certificate, I guess they assume Reggie Love was just fabricating that bit of information. It’s strange though to me, that Breitbart’s news editors take Love at his word about the details of Obama’s activities during the Bin Laden raid which occurred on May 1, 2011, even though it took place only four days after the press conference (on April 27) in which the pdf “copy” (riddled with dubious digital artifacts) of the newly proffered Birth Certificate was posted to the White House website.
I presume the Body Man’s memory is to be trusted as accurate for events that happened as recently as May 2011, but any account he reveals for events that took place as long ago as, say, April 27th of the same year are likely to be obscured by the passage of time? For Mr. Awr Hawkins to conclude otherwise would be to risk a skeptical glance toward Obama’s official identity declarations, but Breitbart.com is well known to yoked in with the broad journalism community in its immutable commitment to avert its eyes from the tiniest of shadowy hints about that story.
Surely, Mr. Obama would not subject Americans to deceit or fraud when it comes to his own identity? Surely Joe Arpaio and his investigators (and the Court-certified Document examiner who has been relied upon by Obama’s own law firm) are simply fuzzy and confused about all that—just like Reggie Love is. Ehh, Breitbart? Mr. Hawkins?
Excellent post ecinkc!