Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6
Runway has GPS approach but it looks like the flight was using the Localizer approach and PAPI.

How would the pilots use what they see (PAPI), with autopilot and autothrottle? I've seen nothing yet about whether they were using GPS.

44 posted on 08/17/2013 8:54:00 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

NTSB said they were briefed on LOC 18, so I assume that’s the approach they used.

AFAIK, you don’t use A/P when landing unless you are doing some form of Autoland with ILS, which wouldn’t apply here.

With PAPI you just need to watch the lights. You don’t need anything but your eyes on the runway and your hands/feet on the controls.

A/T would primarily be to maintain the correct landing speed.

But I’m not any sort of pilot...


53 posted on 08/17/2013 10:27:03 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Looks like 6/24 has precision approach capability.

18/36 does not. 6/24 was closed at the time, so this was a non-precision approach.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_approach#Non-precision_approaches_and_systems


54 posted on 08/17/2013 10:39:19 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Having the A/P and A/T on until the crash sort of suggests that they were not set up correctly, and that the crew allowed the A/P to fly them into the ground...

Pending further/more accurate info, of course...


55 posted on 08/17/2013 11:25:08 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson