Birthers wave off those birth announcements, saying that Obama family members 48 years ago could have phoned in false information to both newspapers.
Such vital statistics, however, were not sent to the newspapers by the general public but by the Health Department, which received the information directly from hospitals, Okubo said.
Birth announcements from the public ran elsewhere in both papers and usually included information such as the newborn’s name, weight and time of birth.
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2009/Jul/28/ln/hawaii907280345.html
It is well known that during this time, Hawaii was a gateway for people from other countries to easily get US citizenship. The article you site from 2009 is not credible and is full of inaccuracies and distortions.
The bottom line is that the birth announcements, the article you site or a computer generated digital pdf file is not acceptable to apply for a child to play in little league baseball or make application for a passport.
Yet you are willing to accept it as proof as eligibility for the highest office in the land..... Doesn't pass the smell test.
Zullo is right, the birth announcements and birth registry don’t mean anything. They are just line items. The newspaper birth announcements don’t even tell where the birth took place. It only states a birth took place. Also Zullo found evidence where 2 adopted individuals were placed in the birth announcements as newborn infants 3 years after their birth. So in essence, the newspaper birth announcements are not credible information. They are not official documents.