Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bluecat6

“They depend on positive (vs. natural) law for citizenship.”

So such thing as “positive law”. See my previous post about the needed use of “natural” in the Constitution.

“1401 describe a ‘born citizen’. That is only half the equation.”

Nope. “natural born citizen” = “citizen at birth”.


73 posted on 08/30/2013 1:55:57 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

“Nope. “natural born citizen” = “citizen at birth”.”

“born citizen” = “citizen at birth”

If the citizen at birth / born citizen was the qualification what function does the word “natural” have.

Do you speak English as a first language?

Can you not read the words.


199 posted on 08/30/2013 5:52:06 PM PDT by bluecat6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson