Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
When you start? You sadly seem to have started long ago.

The clear picture is that the vast majority of legal scholarship on this subject, both liberal and conservative agree with the conclusions of this article.

You can pout and scream all you want, but that's the simple truth. There simply is NO precedent in any court for the opposite view, yet here you are keeping your fist clenched and wanting to believe otherwise.

Cruz IS eligible, and if he runs, I surely hope you're not so stupid as to let some foolish internet ramblings you appear to believe to allow you to let Christie or Hillary (or any other demonrat), the ones who actually do have conflicting loyalties to win.

I'm totally amazed at how some of those "conservatives" who think the GOPE are morons can actually be more stupid than them.

197 posted on 09/03/2013 9:18:46 PM PDT by Lakeshark (KILL THE BILL! CALL. FAX. WRITE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark

Are all these people who refuse to even look at the other side of this issue as dedicated to the sanctity of the 16th Amendment as they are to these three words?


200 posted on 09/03/2013 10:08:34 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Ignoring your extended ad hominem attack on me for having another opinion, nevertheless this discussion apparently ended right here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3059031/posts?page=324#324

Apologies for the cold link. Have a nice day.

323 posted on 09/05/2013 5:10:21 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson