I’m sorry you are clueless. Feel free to rage against everyone, since no state, no member of Congress & no court subscribes to your peculiar interpretation of the law.
I have not ignored “the evidence” Indeed, I’ve provided examples of NBC & NBS being used interchangeably, repeatedly, before and after the Constitution was written by one of the ratifying legislatures. You, OTOH, seem to have no clue about the common law used and understood by the Founders at the time.
So go on losing. But if Ted Cruz runs, FreeRepublic will stand by him while the birthers go even more bananas.
“I’m sorry you are clueless.”
That is just your own hopelessly wishful thinking and attempt to evade the the evidence of the legal definitions I mentioned.
“Feel free to rage against everyone, since no state, no member of Congress & no court subscribes to your peculiar interpretation of the law.”
Your false accusation of “rage” is just another transparent attempt to use ridicule as a tool for discouraging readers from taking the evidence seriously, just as Saul Alinsky taught as a tactic for Marxists to bury the truth in a debate. You follow up with a plain and outright lie with the absurd claim that “no state, no member of Congress & no court subscribes to your peculiar interpretation of the law;”
Given the historical fact that the U.S. natural born citizen had the right guaranteed by the Constitution to be an infidel and not a Christian, while the infidel was forbidden the right to be a natural born subject, a status reserved only for Christians; it is therefore quite obvious that it is impossible for the U.S. Natural born citizen status to be “interchangeable” with the British natural born subject status of 1789 that required the person to be none other than a Christian in religious faith.