blah, blah, blah. You want to use foreign documents in US courts but then want to bitch when the judges bring in their own. That’s a fact, sweetcheeks.
“blah, blah, blah. You want to use foreign documents in US courts but then want to bitch when the judges bring in their own. That’s a fact, sweetcheeks.”
Yes, that is correct only so far as it is a half-truth used as a deception by omitting how the citations are inapplicable, inadmissable, and/or non-existant cases. yes, (LOL) there is nothing quite like your “judges bring in their own” fictitious and non-existant cited sources for precedents that never existed. It’s like using a faked Obama birth certificate to vouch for the authenticity of a faked English court precedent to vouch for the authenticity of Obama’s faked birth certificate to vouch for the authenticity of another person’s non-existant natural born citizenship. What could go wrong with that!?!