Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark
The burden should be on those challenging otherwise eligible candidates to demonstrate through clear and convincing historical evidence and legal argument why such persons should be disqualified.

"..... because I want it to be that way; that works for me." Birthers are not nuts, and Obama is not NBC, that is why all the pettifogging, lying, and concealment.

Occam's Razor.

70 posted on 09/03/2013 11:37:40 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
Read the article to understand why he concludes that. This isn't just an internet "commentator", he's a highly respected lawyer. There's a lot of research and quote attribution, good discussion, etc. He also goes out of his way to say those who disagree aren't nuts, and clearly says the term "birther" was made up as a pejorative term.

Try reading it instead of criticizing first.

74 posted on 09/03/2013 11:45:43 AM PDT by Lakeshark (KILL THE BILL! CALL. FAX. WRITE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson