Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/04/2013 6:13:28 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: Hojczyk

The real question is why anyone with a brain still watches O’Reily?


2 posted on 09/04/2013 6:14:52 PM PDT by svcw (Stand or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Bush’s fault!


3 posted on 09/04/2013 6:16:03 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
"You're going to blame Bush?"

"Of course"

BWAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!!

4 posted on 09/04/2013 6:16:48 PM PDT by bigheadfred (INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

James Carville parody from the Rush archives.
http://dailyrushbo.com/elrushbo-predicts-sunday-news-shows-will-ask-republicans-if-they-are-sabotaging-the-economy/


5 posted on 09/04/2013 6:18:35 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Carville could go waaaaaaayyy back and blame George Washington. Yea, why not?
Carville is a big fricking liberal, socialist idiot, but the real problem is, the low information voters will believe everything Serpent Head says.


6 posted on 09/04/2013 6:18:49 PM PDT by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

No Snakehead, it is because this guy is destabilizing the Middle East.


8 posted on 09/04/2013 6:21:04 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Carvile is a detestable worm.


9 posted on 09/04/2013 6:21:38 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the people. T Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

“Gaddafi was Bush’s Bitch” (Ann Coulter)


11 posted on 09/04/2013 6:22:32 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Of course, the Iraq thing is why people have so much trepidation about going into Syria. They said the last time we went over there, look what happened. I really think this has something to do with it.

Yeah, that Iraq thing was a real Quagmire wasn't it? No objective, no exit plan.

12 posted on 09/04/2013 6:23:30 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Wisdom is learning from your mistakes and vowing not to repeat them. Iraq could have been a success but the “Progressives”, who see the US as an Empire, made sure that it failed.


14 posted on 09/04/2013 6:25:10 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Wow.... Throws out the Bin Laden card first sentence...

You know you lost the argument when you toss out the Bin Laden from the get go....sort of like Godwin’s law ...


18 posted on 09/04/2013 6:26:15 PM PDT by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

No, my problem is pissing off the Russians.


19 posted on 09/04/2013 6:27:12 PM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

This was so predictable. It was only a question as to who would be the stooge to say it.


20 posted on 09/04/2013 6:27:19 PM PDT by omni-scientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
I think what really is freaking people out is the incompetence of the Bush administration in Iraq.

I think what is freaking people out is that Bush fought against Al Qaeda and Obama is arming them and installing them in power.

22 posted on 09/04/2013 6:29:51 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

I truly believe if Mr. Obama were to behead and barbecue a troop of Christian girl scouts on the White House lawn during the Easter Egg Roll, it’d somehow be George Bush and the Tea Party’s fault for making him do it.


23 posted on 09/04/2013 6:31:46 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I aim to raise a million plus for Gov. Palin. What'll you do?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”
—President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
—President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

“Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
—Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
—Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.”
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
— Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

“Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
— Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

“There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
— Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them.”
— Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
— Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
— Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
— Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons...”
— Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”
— Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”
— Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

“He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do”
— Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
— Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.”
— Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real...”
— Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


24 posted on 09/04/2013 6:33:04 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

I hate these satire posts.


25 posted on 09/04/2013 6:34:55 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Carville=typical liberal idiot


26 posted on 09/04/2013 6:37:05 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

No Jimmy, we are freaking out because we have NO LEGITIMATE REASON to go there!!!


28 posted on 09/04/2013 6:38:32 PM PDT by anoldafvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Chickens coming home to roost..!


29 posted on 09/04/2013 6:38:51 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Is John Boehner the Neville Chamberlain of American Politics?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson