Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dforest
Why would you do that when you knew by these very plans that there would have to be.

Because securing the Chem weapons was an objective proposed by 0. The 75000 troops are part of the course of action (COA) that would make that happen. If troops are a no-go because 0 blinks due to the political pressure or the presence of the Russians, the proposed objective would be considered unachievable and rejected for that reason.

10 posted on 09/05/2013 12:09:27 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: xone

Obama did not say he was going into Syria to secure chemical weapons. He said he was going to shoot missiles into Syria to teach Assad a lesson about crossing his red line. er..he didn’t say red line, uh...the world did. /sarc

In fact, Obama has not proposed any of this other stuff people are talking about. This is how he won’t take the blame if he lied and Americans died.


11 posted on 09/05/2013 12:17:28 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson