"Do not link my phrase to this King-George poseur!"
‘Common-sense test’ tells me if the White House wants this then it will definitely hurt America.
Weapons. Grade. Stupid.
I can’t believe an administration member is using that language to say we should bomb a country.
Common sense says this entire crew should be tarred, feathered and run out of town on a rail!
From the leftist playbook: If the facts don’t help your argument state or imply your opponent is ignorant, dumb or lacks “common sense”.
Common sense with the Obama administration? Oh Puleeeezzze!
Common sense? Translation: we don’t have any evidence.
At Zero Hedge - High-Level U.S. Intelligence Officers: Syrian Government Didn’t Launch Chemical Weapons The Obama administration has selectively used intelligence to justify military strikes on Syria, former military officers with access to the original intelligence reports say, in a manner that goes far beyond what critics charged the Bush administration of doing in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war. According to these officers, who served in top positions in the United States, Britain, France, Israel, and Jordan, a Syrian military communication intercepted by Israel’s famed Unit 8200 electronic intelligence outfit has been doctored so that it leads a reader to just the opposite conclusion reached by the original report.
Common Sense indicates that Bammy is irresponsible.
"Do not link my phrase to this King-George poseur!"
Common sense would suggest that Assad is not suicidal enough to risk the consequences of his chemical warfare attacks. However, Assad may not be entirely rational just now. We just don’t know with certainty.
Common sense test? This is beyond absurd.
Would it be common sense for Assad, who has the upper hand against the Al Queda rebels, to launch a gas attack against defenseless women & children and risk international military involvement against his regime?
Or, would it be common sense to expect a regime that has to contend with the roll out of 0-care, facing numerous scandals, and a declining economy to divert the public’s attention with a war?
There is no way I could ever trust the US regime on anything. What I think could have happened is that the US regime paid off a rogue member of Assad’s military to pull off the attack.
… Wesley Clark’s new memoir suggests that another war is part of a long-planned Department of Defense strategy that anticipated “regime change” by force in no fewer than seven Mideast states. Critics of the war have often voiced suspicions of such imperial schemes, but this is the first time that a high-ranking former military officer has claimed to know that such plans existed.[ 2007]
..‘Here’s the paper from the Office of the Secretary of Defense [then Donald Rumsfeld] outlining the strategy. We’re going to take out seven countries in five years.’ And he named them, starting with Iraq and Syria and ending with Iran.”
BTW, common sense tells us Assad had nothing to gain and everything to lose by attacking with gas.
Common sense also tells us the “rebel” insurgents, who were losing badly, had everything to gain by staging a false flag gas attack to force the United Stated to intervene on their behalf
They know exactly who did it, THEM. This could very quickly turn around from zero’s admin wanting to blast Syria to the world community talking about blasting us for zero’s admin supporting the “rebels” (i.e., Al Qaeda) and allowing chem to be used.
With all the Black on White race crimes perpetrated by feral Black Yutes common sense tells me st. trayvon martin was the attacker.
Liar in Chief, Barack Hussien Obama.
Under the Thomas Jefferson “common sense test,” the Second American Revolution would have started already.
Common sense? The kakistocrats wouldn’t know common sense if it bit them on the posterior.
If the nation was run by amateurs,, how long would it last?
we may find out a lot sooner than anyone would care to..