Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some LGBT activists outraged by new dress code for Dallas Pride
Dallas Voice ^ | Sept 11, 2013 | John Wright

Posted on 09/11/2013 7:53:05 PM PDT by kevcol

In a controversy that threatened to overshadow the 30th anniversary of Dallas’ gay Pride parade, some LGBT activists expressed outrage this week after organizers reminded participants about the need for the event to be family-friendly and said nudity and lewd behavior will no longer be tolerated.
.
.
.
Jeremy Liebbe, a detective sergeant at Dallas Independent School District, will oversee 95 officers from DPD and DISD as co-commander of security for the parade and festival. Liebbe, who’s gay, said any floats in violation of indecency standards will be warned in the lineup on Wycliff Avenue prior to the parade. If they fail to comply before reaching the parade route, they will be removed from the parade and individuals may be charged with class-B misdemeanor indecent exposure. But Liebbe added: “If there’s an erection and a child is present that could see it, it is a felony, and we don’t want to see that happen.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasvoice.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: dallas; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; jeremyliebbe; moralabsolutes; perverts; queeringamerica; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: kevcol

Good grief. I’ve been living in DFW for eight years, and never even knew about this. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. I suppose every large city has a ‘gay day’ nowadays.

When I was a young musician in L.A., my buddies and I would go to the gay festival in Silverlake to hear the bands. After the big parade was over, it was 90% straight folks there, so we felt comfortable.

I wouldn’t get within a mile of a gay festival today.


21 posted on 09/11/2013 8:52:45 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
But every gay person just wants to live a normal life with their adopted children... /S
22 posted on 09/11/2013 9:15:18 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

what about lesbian nipple erections, i sure hope’to hell those are felonies too. maybe they can be charged with two felonies.


23 posted on 09/11/2013 9:18:24 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

inherent in their perverted nature.


24 posted on 09/11/2013 9:19:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: liege

seriously you don’t think it will be erect?


25 posted on 09/11/2013 9:20:09 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

namely that it requires they be dressed.


26 posted on 09/11/2013 9:20:33 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

she’s the typical obese lesbian.


27 posted on 09/11/2013 9:21:32 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
I was only commenting on the absurdity of the language regarding whether something would be illegal or not based on whether someone had an erection or not.

Is not a naked man in public cause enough for arrest?

28 posted on 09/11/2013 9:29:00 PM PDT by bubbacluck (America 180)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: liege

not at a privileged protected class gay pride parade. their normal is not our normal. regular people would be arrested .


29 posted on 09/11/2013 9:33:20 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

I thought they wanted to be treated like everyone else...


30 posted on 09/11/2013 9:37:00 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

some LGBT activists expressed outrage this week after organizers reminded participants about the need for the event to be family-friendly and said nudity and lewd behavior will no longer be tolerated.
.-———————————————————————————

They want to be as gross as possible in public. Heterosexuals being nude and lewd in public would be slapped down, but some in the LGBT want superior rights.


31 posted on 09/11/2013 9:42:20 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

These parades are Satanic covens, nothing more.

I wonder if cops are required to work this event.


32 posted on 09/11/2013 9:54:56 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

President Putin would have the faggots thrown in a gulag.


33 posted on 09/11/2013 10:05:32 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
You saw a lot of naked erections at your school?

Public schools must be worse than I thought.

34 posted on 09/11/2013 10:17:54 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
...Ms. hogger on the far left at #13...

I see only 3 possibilities:

a) fag hag.
b) proud bovine clamlicker.
c) Code pink operative... which would obviously wheel "a" or "b" into the answer.

35 posted on 09/11/2013 11:25:34 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I wonder if cops are required to work this event.

I would imagine so since these folks pay their salaries.


36 posted on 09/12/2013 3:44:37 AM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Perversion is an outdated, 20th century concept. Now we say, “different”, children...


37 posted on 09/12/2013 3:48:59 AM PDT by epluribus_2 (he had the best mom - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

QUOTE: a) fag hag.


That is SOOooo 20th century.

Try “fairy princess.”

*snort*


38 posted on 09/12/2013 4:15:02 AM PDT by Peet (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
But Liebbe added: “If there’s an erection, and a child is present that could see it, it is a felony, and we don’t want to see that happen.”

There, that's better.

39 posted on 09/12/2013 4:17:23 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
"Keep your nose out of what I do in the bedroom, but let me shove it in your face if I want to."

"No."

"Waaah!"

40 posted on 09/12/2013 4:19:38 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson