Replies

An honest investigation would likely reveal that the Benghazi betrayal was done to enable our enemies to succeed in capturing ambassador Stevens, either to trade him later for the Blind Sheik or to kill him outright in order to cover aka obama’s tracks in supplying weapons to our enemies in Syria or elsewhere. While the simple act of denying a rescue attempt might not by itself be treason, when coupled with the reason behind the denial, it most certainly is.

Bingo you can pass go and collect...'

Most likely ansar al sharia, the hired terror types by Morsi's MB which was hired/bribed to the tune of 8.4 billion by the dear leader was surprised when they met any resistance at all in Benghazi.

the fix was supposedly in and all they(ansar al sharia) had to do was walk in, Steal Stevens and eventually trade him for the blind sheik making zero look Presidential as he would broker the deal. All this only weeks before the election.(and with 35 CIA agents smuggling arms looking on as well.)

Of course the entire thing backfired and now everyone wants to know where zero was when it all went down. That of course "is" the story since he was screwing around with a ten year old African male while doing drugs. Hence, the Reggie and I were playing cards excuse.Yeah right!

It's all ens with impeachment for them unless Boehner keeps falling into their numerous traps like Syria, the debt ceiling and soon amnesty. You can be sure he will.