Sorry, FRiend, but I’m not going to debate your article.
***Of course not, HEretic, because the article already proves the vast majority of what you’ve been saying is simple heresy.
It’s all I can do to keep up with what you’re posting here — including all your Four-D’s.
***The other article is on the religion forum, and the kind of posts you started out with would be wiped clean. We would have ended up discussing historicity, which is what I wanted to do. But you’re here to troll, push heresy, and disrupt & want nothing to do with an orderly exchange. Oh well, at least out here in the open forum I get to properly label you as a genuine heretic.
I'll tell you what, FRiend, I'll make you a deal: I'll read & study your article just as carefully as you read & study some of John Domonic Crossan's books.
Now, isn't that fair?
You report back to me when you've read some of Crossan's books, and then I'll go study your article, OK?