Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

” The state attorney general has appealed for a longer sentence to the Montana Supreme Court”

I don’t get this. Of course I think he should have been given longer time. But he had his trial, was guilty and was sentenced. He served his time. Is he to be recharged and then taken back to court. Somebody please explain why this is not double jeopardy.


19 posted on 09/26/2013 7:17:49 PM PDT by navyblue (<u>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: navyblue

According to this the judge screwed up on the sentencing.

excerpt:

“Baugh’s office has said he has no comment on the complaint. He has acknowledged mishandling the case and that state law mandates a two-year minimum prison term for Rambold. He’s also apologized for the comments he made about Moralez at an Aug. 26 sentencing hearing.”

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/mont-judge-faulted-alleged-bias-rape-case-20362706


22 posted on 09/26/2013 7:49:44 PM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: navyblue
I don’t get this. Of course I think he should have been given longer time. But he had his trial, was guilty and was sentenced. He served his time. Is he to be recharged and then taken back to court. Somebody please explain why this is not double jeopardy.

You got it right.

And it should apply double if there's a federal beef under consideration, any insult to the President of the United States or his Attorney General being fully intentional!

27 posted on 09/26/2013 11:49:21 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson