thanks for posting this Kaslin and please note that my criticism isn’t pointed at you.
Now, having read this piece, can anyone tell me which side of the issue is the author standing? Why would any responsible person (that dismisses the dhimmicrats) favor legislation that cheapens the 1st Amendment?
Unarguably, the sole purpose of Dify’s proposal is to protect the power elite and the best way for that is to cheapen the first amendment, as you put it. Similarly, the power elite, (Dify for one, would disarm the citizen in a heart beat) have for years been cheapening the second amendment by passing anti-gun laws that first constrains the people’s right and by design perverts it’s original intent. That is precisely what is taking place here with this “define the news reporter” bill. This administration and the three before it have not only cheapened the US constitution, they have perverted and ignored it. It is my sense regarding the first 10 amendments, all but the first two partially remain but under the obozo administration, are clearly in peril. Eventually the people will lose them just as the others have been lost to lawlessness by the entrenched corrupted ruling elite DC tyrants of whom too many still so foolishly place their trust to govern this country.