Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Senate Democrats vow to keep the government shutdown.
1 posted on 10/01/2013 2:28:42 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tobyhill

HOLD THE LINE, and take up individual spending bills, then just SEND THEM OVER TO THE SENATE, and if they reject them (or propose more spending-and make a big “fuss over cancer research, etc..” fund those too..then Dare them to vote against those spending bills!).

Then wait a few days (if the Senate hasn’t funded them), then we’re home free..


2 posted on 10/01/2013 2:35:22 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Is John Boehner the Neville Chamberlain of American Politics?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Heck, send separate Military, Social Security and Medicare bills to the Senate.

That’s pretty much all the voters care about.


3 posted on 10/01/2013 2:36:10 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (I REFUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the Republican effort a "wacky idea" that would simply "cherry-pick some of the few parts of government that they like."

The House of Representatives is where spending bills originate. There is something really childish with an "all or nothing" demand by the Democrats.

It does not make sense to reject a spending bill that is perfectly acceptable otherwise. Do the Democrats really care about their constituents?

During the Reagen years of seven or eight government shutdowns, nobody noticed except the affected workers. What is the big deal today?

4 posted on 10/01/2013 2:38:12 PM PDT by olezip (Time obliterates the fictions of opinion and confirms the decisions of nature. ~ Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Bammy today"

"I did not have deficit with that budget! Not once! Never!" "

5 posted on 10/01/2013 2:42:38 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Mr. Reid seems not to remember what the Constitution says about spending bills first originating in the House, not the Senate. It is the Senate that must approve a House spending measure, not the House that must approve a Senate spending measure. Let’s follow the Constitution as written!


7 posted on 10/01/2013 2:44:27 PM PDT by garfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
I'm starting to see this more as Harry Reid vs. the Constitution. Look at this comment, will ya!

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the Republican effort a "wacky idea" that would simply "cherry-pick some of the few parts of government that they like."

So, what Harry Reid is saying is that the only way that the Senate will agree to fun ANY of the Government is if the House sends them one big bill that has everything in it funded at current levels.

In other words, the House has no function in deciding where to spend money, they are on auto-pilot now.

That's not what the Constitution lays out as their respective roles though, is it.

When you look at it that way it's about more than government shutdowns now, it's about whether the House has any power.

8 posted on 10/01/2013 2:46:41 PM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
...Democrats rejected the plan...

Republicans, this is where you have the potential to have mush mouth Reid by the short hairs.

Go to every available camera and let the American people know you are trying to pass specific measures to help tourists, garbage men, blue collar workers, etc.--

and the Obama-led DemonRATS are refusing to help!

11 posted on 10/01/2013 3:01:33 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

This is actually brilliant - thank you Senator Ted Cruz - by funding specific budget items it shows the American People exactly what they’re paying for. If Ried wants to shut down funding for parks let him.


12 posted on 10/01/2013 3:05:52 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

The GOP should send funding measures to the Senate piecemeal (EPA last if at all) when each one is voted down in the Senate it goes on a bulletin board with the word “NYET” under it.


15 posted on 10/01/2013 3:19:00 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The Presidency is broken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
* " Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the Republican effort a "wacky idea" that would simply "cherry-pick some of the few parts of government that they like." *


Yeah Dingle Berry Harry Reid, AS IF !!!


As if your guys the Democrats won't do the same thing if you held the house.
If you guy were still on power in the house you would do just the very same thing... YOU HYPOCRITE HARRY !
17 posted on 10/01/2013 3:25:58 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

The White House is now also on record with a veto threat for such item-by-item funding.


18 posted on 10/01/2013 3:37:39 PM PDT by Thoreauaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

We don’t need to resume spending on any stinkin’ pork, either.


20 posted on 10/01/2013 3:53:39 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.), Army National Guard, '89-'96)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the Republican effort a "wacky idea" that would simply "cherry-pick some of the few parts of government that they like."

Yeah, like the Dems wouldn't try the same thing. At least the Repubs are being proactive and trying something. Keep the Dems on the defensive, they don't like that.

21 posted on 10/01/2013 3:56:02 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

The White House is now also on record with a veto threat for such item-by-item funding.


24 posted on 10/02/2013 7:34:09 AM PDT by Thoreauaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson