Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeal The 17th

“I don’t see how this is different from what has already been tried.”

I don’t see either. There is some legal minutiae that wasn’t explained or understood by the author, or that I don’t understand.

And other posts stated this too: if whatever the House sends doesn’t have ACA funding, both Reid and Obama will reject anyway.


32 posted on 10/03/2013 5:30:00 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: ReaganGeneration2; Repeal The 17th

““I don’t see how this is different from what has already been tried.”
I don’t see either. There is some legal minutiae that wasn’t explained or understood by the author, or that I don’t understand.
And other posts stated this too: if whatever the House sends doesn’t have ACA funding, both Reid and Obama will reject anyway.”

The difference is they did not need to send over permission to not include it to begin with


37 posted on 10/03/2013 5:54:10 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson