fags induce the grounds for prejudice into the picture. Just another show of their sick minds.
If a same sex couple wants to use a bakery for their "ceremony", there's nothing in the law that prevents them from quoting a price of $5,000 for the cake, to include a nonrefundable deposit of $4,000.
If the LGBT bullies seek to persist, the owners can accommodate them by saying they'll donate all profits to the local women's shelter, or another organization of their choosing.
Guerrilla war, not a frontal assault is the way to defeat the enemy.
Easy solution. Make lousy photographs and crappy cakes for homos. Word will get around and the homos will stay away.
If a wedding photographer refuses to fix your car, is it discrimination? Why should they be required to attend fake weddings? It’s not their job.
The solution is simple. Every Christian photographer posts the following on their web site:
“NOTICE: All proceeds from homosexual wedding photography are donated to NARTH- The National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality”
How about not baking wedding cakes? Sell the various iced layers and let the customers construct them at the wedding venue. Sell the bride and groom (smirk) decoration as well as a can of icing needed to inscribe their cake.
Once the cake leaves the shop who cares what they do with it.
There’s an easy workaround to this. Agree to do the work but then do a crappy job with the photos, cake, flowers or whatever. They’ll get upset and you can offer to refund their money. They can post nasty notes on Yelp and be sure to tell all their gay friends.
The business suffers a minor reputation hit but, so what? You weren’t marketing for these people anyway.
Or you can take the position that your profession is like any other business and gladly take their money and work humbly as unto the Lord to the best of your ability.
Heck, you could even pass out special business cards at the wedding with scriptural references (just the reference, not the verse) where God condemns homosexual behavior. 99% of them will never look the verse up but the ones that do will have received a special passage from you that MIGHT get them to rethink their behavior.
There is a civil-disobedience solution to this:
Let me first state that I video-tape weddings as a side gig, so I know of what I speak.
Weddings, are by definition PRIVATE events. Where the wedding party can invite who they want, and that invitee cannot and will not be stopped from performing whatever service is asked of them by the wedding party while they are in attendance.
I have made it clear that I only video-tape private events in which I accept the invitation as a guest. Get it?
The bride invited me... and asked me to take pictures. The groom invited me; I sent back an RSVP, and they called and asked me to bake a cake.
The mother of the groom invited my spouse, and asked if her spouse could bring flower from my flower shop for the event.
Oh, and I’m ALWAYS booked, or my plates full. Period.
The main rule is NOT TO SUBMIT. The sodiites know damn well there are people in the wedding business catering almost exclusively to them. These court cases are mere intimidation. If we surrender, it’ll only get worse.
No one can say anything if you do your task as a GUEST of the wedding party.