Sure -- I remember that, too. I don't think you're understanding what I meant.
If he's serious about this, I'm looking for Nichols to come out and say 'I killed so-and-so on such-and-such a date, using this weapon', along with locations, time of day and details about the crimes that are only known to the killer and law-enforcement.
He's been ignored for how many years now, and he's going to continue to be portrayed as a nutbar if he can't produce indisputable evidence. Otherwise, he'll just be characterized as an attention-seeking lunatic.
If he did, you wonder if anyone would care, anymore. I suppose it would depend on how close the Clinton people are to the Obama Justice Department.
I never assume what used to be shameful or illegal is still shameful or illegal.
I do agree with you.