Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP CEO: Press freedom v. security a 'false choice'
Stars and Stripes ^ | 10/20/2013

Posted on 10/20/2013 3:20:35 AM PDT by markomalley

Governments that try to force citizens to decide between a free press and national security create a "false choice" that weakens democracy, and journalists must fight increasing government overreach that has had a chilling effect on efforts to hold leaders accountable, the president and CEO of The Associated Press said.

Gary Pruitt told the 69th General Assembly of the Inter American Press Association on Saturday that the U.S. Justice Department's secret seizure of records of thousands of telephone calls to and from AP reporters in 2012 is one of the most blatant violations of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution the 167-year-old news cooperative has ever encountered.

The Justice Department action involving the AP resonated far beyond the U.S., including Latin America, where journalists for decades have fought to exercise press freedoms under authoritarian regimes, Pruitt said.

"The actions by the Department of Justice could not have been more tailor-made to comfort authoritarian regimes who want to suppress the news media. `The United States does it too,' they can say," Pruitt said.

A free and independent press "differentiates democracy from dictatorship; separates a free society from tyranny," he said.

"Governments who try to set up a situation where citizens think they must choose between a free press and security are making a mistake that will ultimately weaken them, not strengthen them. It's not a real choice. It is a false choice."

Pruitt said he was encouraged by proposed Justice Department guidelines, introduced after the records seizure, that would give news media advance notice of subpoenas so the press can challenge those actions in court; protect not just phone records but reporters' email, text messages and other forms of electronic communication; and guarantee that journalists won't be prosecuted for doing their jobs.

"But you can bet that we will be watching closely to make sure they are implemented and enforced," Pruitt said.

In 2012, the Justice Department secretly obtained records of work, cell and home numbers of AP journalists, as well as AP bureau numbers in New York, Washington, D.C., Hartford, Conn., and the AP number in the U.S. House of Representatives press gallery. It did so after an Associated Press story revealed the foiling of a plot in Yemen to bomb a U.S.-bound airliner at a time the Barack Obama administration was insisting publicly that it had no information about terrorist organizations plotting attacks on the United States in that period.

The Justice Department was trying to identify who leaked information for the AP story - but it didn't tell the AP about its phone records seizure until a year after the story ran.

The seizure was "hardly a surgical strike on a few carefully chosen targets. It was overbroad, sloppy and a fishing expedition into a wide spectrum of AP news journalism and journalists - most of whom had nothing to do with the issues in question here," Pruitt said.

It also differed from the National Security Agency's broad monitoring of global communications because it was specifically directed at locating the source of AP's reporting.

Just as alarming, the seizure has intimidated both official and nonofficial sources from speaking to the AP and numerous other news organizations, even about stories not related to national security, Pruitt said.

"Now, the government may love this. I think they do. But beware a government that loves secrecy too much," he said.

And the challenge isn't going away, Pruitt said.

"The attack on journalism - here in the United States and throughout the rest of the world - is not going to cease any time soon. In fact, I think it will become even more difficult to counter as technology gives governments very powerful tools to monitor the actions and communications of citizens and journalists," he said.

The Miami-based Inter American Press Association has about 1,400 member news organizations and promotes press freedoms throughout the Americas.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Of course this AP CEO doesn't see the irony in his statement: he -- and the other left-wing sycophantic enablers have acted as PR agents for the current "occupy 1600 Pennsylvania" group, which brought us to this point of a near totalitarian government.
1 posted on 10/20/2013 3:20:35 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Actually, the CEO of the AP is probably reminding his employees that there is some chance the next occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania will be an R not D. They will have to try to remember how to do their job if that happens.


2 posted on 10/20/2013 3:33:19 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Oh, puleeeeez. The AP didn’t have any problems lambasting Republican administrations and the only one I see whose journalistic freedom is being restrained is Sheryl Atkinsson because her higher ups are covering for the puke that occupies the WH now.


3 posted on 10/20/2013 3:36:54 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I haven’t seen a Free Press in America in years.


4 posted on 10/20/2013 4:12:04 AM PDT by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Pruitt said he was encouraged by proposed Justice Department guidelines, introduced after the records seizure, that would give news media advance notice of subpoenas so the press can challenge those actions in court

Jounalists, instead of looking for special dispensations, if you'd just do your damned jobs with some vigor and some integrity that action, by itself, would protect you from runaway government.


5 posted on 10/20/2013 5:27:13 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck
To extend your point, to the speaker: What are you going to DO about it? (Hint - nothing - they're in bed with the 0bama administration).

Unless and until the administration starts rounding up journalists and publicly executing them, journalists may p!$$ and whine a bit about losing their "freedom", but as long as it's the Democrats who are abusing them, they're going to be like a battered spouse when the cops show up - "But deep down he really loves me".

If it a Republican administration had taken their phone records, that would have been the number one news story for a YEAR. These pukes deserve whatever abuse they get from the government.

6 posted on 10/20/2013 6:00:29 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (You can keep your doctor - if you lock him in your basement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson