Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COBOL2Java

“arguing in part that actions concerning her staff are protected under the Speech or Debate clause of the Constitution. In a lengthy ruling, the judge disagreed.”

too bad Sens Packwood and Hatfield didn’t have the benefit of her BRILLIANT legal advice


14 posted on 10/23/2013 9:26:27 AM PDT by stonewall_jackson215
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stonewall_jackson215

Maybe they should have gone to you.


15 posted on 10/23/2013 9:30:48 AM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: stonewall_jackson215

Queenie shouldnt hire disabled folk if she dont like the limitations they have. Queenie is stupid though. ha ha.


16 posted on 10/23/2013 9:31:12 AM PDT by Gasshog (Welcome to the United States of Stupidos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: stonewall_jackson215

Hatfield was never accused of harassment, was he?


18 posted on 10/23/2013 9:51:57 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what ma kes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson