To: SoConPubbie
SoConPubbie said:
"What you think it should be ..." What do you think it should be? I'm of the opinion that the Constitution should have the meaning that our Founders intended. If settled law disagrees with that, then settled law is wrong and should be changed.
To: William Tell
What do you think it should be? I'm of the opinion that the Constitution should have the meaning that our Founders intended. If settled law disagrees with that, then settled law is wrong and should be changed.
What I think or what you think is immaterial in this discussion. What is of importance is the current state of applicable US Law, and nothing in the U.S. Constitution, U.S. Law, or Supreme Court Ruling supports the contention of those pushing the idea that to be eligible to be President of the U.S. you need two citizen parents at the time of birth.
There are more important battles to fight.
This a time-wasting worthless fight.
82 posted on
10/29/2013 10:48:19 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: William Tell
What do you think it should be? I'm of the opinion that the Constitution should have the meaning that our Founders intended. If settled law disagrees with that, then settled law is wrong and should be changed. I agree with this.
738 posted on
10/31/2013 7:54:15 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson