Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jdsteel

Mitt Romney argued that it was unconstitutional Federally, but was constitutional in Massachusetts..

Is the New American a reputable paper?


32 posted on 11/05/2013 9:07:35 PM PST by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: mylife
Mitt Romney argued that it was unconstitutional Federally, but was constitutional in Massachusetts..

Saying that he would FORCE states to do it, that is what would be unconstitutional. If a state did it freely that would not be unconstitutional. Just a mistake.

41 posted on 11/05/2013 9:14:55 PM PST by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: mylife

Romney can never be taken at face value, he wanted to do as president what he did as a failed one-term governor.

“At a 2008 event in New Hampshire, Romney was asked by a voter, “You supported national healthcare in Massachusetts. Are you going to do the same thing on a national?” His response: “Absolutely, I’ve already put a plan out. Take a look at it. Get on my website, take a look.”

Voter: “We are trying to get a 100% health care for all Americans.”
Romney: “Me too, that is what my plan does.””


64 posted on 11/05/2013 9:47:00 PM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson