Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gov_bean_ counter

” 1200 to 1400 “

Not saying your body type, weight, exercise, age, etc. isn’t appropriate for those few calories, but that isn’t much for sustaining most people. The “elderly”, and I use that term very loosely here, can make do on that, but anyone on those few calories must watch the ratios of nutrients in their diet. Anything under 1,000 is considered unhealthy and potentially dangerous.

Registered Dieticians working at assisted living or nursing facilities have a hard time keeping the proper balances for their residents due to the low calorie intake while still trying to ensure proper nutrition.


36 posted on 11/09/2013 8:01:46 AM PST by CodeToad (When ignorance rules a person's decision they are resorting to superstition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

My internist has assured me those are appropriate caloric intake levels.


45 posted on 11/09/2013 8:35:23 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

And my percentage nutritional targets are being met.


46 posted on 11/09/2013 8:42:35 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson