Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP’s “Just Get to 270" Electoral Strategy Needs A Complete Overhaul
The Federalist ^ | NOVEMBER 20, 2013 | Brandon Finnigan

Posted on 11/20/2013 8:36:34 AM PST by JerseyanExile

Rather than doubling down on the “just get to 270″ strategy that’s been utilized by the GOP since 2000, the Republican Party must expand the map if it ever wishes to win another presidential election. Instead of just hoping that Virginia will magically turn red again, the GOP needs to focus on other traditionally Democratic states that have nonetheless moved rightward since 2000.

Using the year 2000 as a baseline, since it was the most recent closely contested race with near-even get-out-the-vote operations between the parties, I wanted to see how the close and swing states (anything decided by a margin of fewer than 10 points) have drifted since then. I started with just the raw margins of these states in 2000, scaled on their +R margin of victory.

some_text

The next map takes the contested states shown above (i.e., those that are not solid red or solid blue) and then scales them based on their relationship to the overall popular vote. A redder/pinker state gave Bush a larger margin than he received nationally, while a bluer state gave Gore a larger margin than he received nationally (purple states roughly mirrored the national popular vote). As the map shows, the middle third of the nation was an electoral hot zone, the West Coast wasn’t yet monolithically blue (nor was the Northeast), and a handful of southern states were surprisingly competitive.

some_text

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016election; electoralstrategy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 11/20/2013 8:36:35 AM PST by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

GOP next priority should be shutting down RAT “voter FRAUD.”


2 posted on 11/20/2013 8:39:20 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

That was one thing Howard Dean got right (but for the wrong side). Put up a fight in all 50 states.


3 posted on 11/20/2013 8:39:59 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

It is in Michigan and its making a difference. Its the result of electing a solid secretary of state who takes it seriously.


4 posted on 11/20/2013 8:42:13 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

The last four presidential elections have been pretty bad for Republicans. I mean 2000 we barely won. Heck even 2004 we barely won. Of course we know that 2008 was a disaster for us and then 2012 was a dang shame but we still got stomped. We definitely need a new plan. We need to get some purpleish states to go straight red instead of blue. If Virginia is lost then we need to make Colorado or Ohio definitely red again.


5 posted on 11/20/2013 8:43:25 AM PST by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

I agree.

I mean we have a guy that is strangely called the architect that gave us a hanging chad election, another squeaker, and subsequent loses which I have no doubt he had a hand in.

Quit fighting for the middle, and start fighting for the country.


6 posted on 11/20/2013 8:44:18 AM PST by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Michigan is a top target, and in within the next decade, as Chicago starts to empty like Detroit due to bankruptcy, Illinois. Makes up somewhat for Virginia. Also need to work on Florida. Not sure what went wrong there last time.


7 posted on 11/20/2013 8:45:28 AM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

The Dems have such an advantage, with Cal, NY and Ill locked, that’s a 104 point lead before the game begins.


8 posted on 11/20/2013 8:45:41 AM PST by nascarnation (Wish everyone you see a "Gay Kwanzaa")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Delegates at the GOP convention in Michigan voted to support getting rid of our winner take all electoral system and giving candidates votes only from congressional districts won.


9 posted on 11/20/2013 8:47:02 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

If it wasn’t so serious it would be funny. The GOPe is getting all twisted like a pretzel to try to find a way to win without conservatives on board. They’ll never out-Dem the Dems but they try anyway.

They foolishly think everyone wants a handout and no one values life, liberty, freedom, and a fair shot at rising as high as their abilities and guts will take them.

They know what to do and say to win, they just refuse to face facts.


10 posted on 11/20/2013 8:47:28 AM PST by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile
The GOP’s “Just Get to 270" Electoral Strategy Needs A Complete Overhaul

I would think the first step would be to quit nominating candidates that negate your strongest campaign positions.

In 2008 McCain took amnesty out of play.

In 2012 Romney took Obamacare out of play.

Maybe this time around the GOP could actually try to nominate a candidate that can go after key Dem weaknesses?

11 posted on 11/20/2013 8:47:38 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

between vote fraud, the moron vote and the MSMwhores pimping the demhole candidate, there will never be another Republican president.


12 posted on 11/20/2013 8:49:01 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

The democrat union ATM should be a major target. States going with RTW laws create festering wounds that just get worse over time.


13 posted on 11/20/2013 8:49:28 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“If Virginia is lost ...”

VA is not lost. McAuliffe only won 48/45. The legislature is republican.


14 posted on 11/20/2013 8:51:31 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

The electoral map is daunting for the right. As stated by another poster, the last four have not been good for us. Even though we won 2 of the 4. 2000 was a squeaker, and 2004 was a solid win but too close considering the candidates and a popular president post-9/11. We didn’t advance in hardly any states from 2000 to 2004. There are a slew of states we should compete in, from Iowa to Ohio to Colorado and Virginia where we cannot seem to win.

We do need new strategies. The pessimist and realist can say the field is simply tilted against us. That’s with the status quo. The optimist with a degree of realism sees we won nearly 50 states in 1984 and 1988. There is something other than demographics that have changed the playing field to that degree in a relatively short time. Some of it is enviromental, some is self-inflicted (moderation, spending issues, wars). Some are factors that can be turned.


15 posted on 11/20/2013 8:52:26 AM PST by ilgipper (Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

“. There is something other than demographics that have changed the playing field to that degree in a relatively short time. “

Free Obama phones ...


16 posted on 11/20/2013 8:54:16 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
We definitely need a new plan.

The GOPelites have been pushing the Bigger Tent idea for a couple of decades and it has wrought losses.

Maybe, a bigger hispanic push?
or blacks?
or gays?


The biggest problem the GOP has is a lack of substance. What do they, as a whole, stand for any more? They have been pushing so fast and far to the left that their conservative base doesn't even recognize them, and they return the favor by calling their base 'wacko-birds' and such.

Read their platform. And how much of that would they actually stand up for? Romney-Ryan gave a lot of platitudes, but the general public didn't believe them to be sincere.

Compound that with their continual inability to formulate effective communications to get their message out. Add to that their inability to effectively counter Dem/Media charges and allegations. They are stuck in neutral.


17 posted on 11/20/2013 8:54:40 AM PST by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

Minnesota isn’t red, blue or purple. It really is independent. It was only a few years ago we had a republican house, senator, and governor. We regularly elect republican US senators.

True we always go democrat for president but part of the reason for that is republicans don’t campaign here. They run a few ads and call it good. They just cede it to the democrats.


18 posted on 11/20/2013 9:01:19 AM PST by DManA (enis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
"VA is not lost. McAuliffe only won 48/45. The legislature is republican."

I agree in part with you. I saw a county by county election map of governor's race in VA and it was a sea of red. This bodes well for the GOP in the legislative races which are contested on a district basis. It does not bode well for statewide races such as governorship or the presidency where a few urban districts can out vote the rest of state due to sheer numbers. Demographic trends are not the friend of the GOPe.

19 posted on 11/20/2013 9:06:59 AM PST by buckalfa (Tilting at Windmills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Smart move. Pennsylvania came close to doing the same thing in 2011. Our Senate Majority leader had the bill introduced, the GOP had a narrow but solid majority in the house as well and our governor had pledged to sign it if passed.

It was our RINO state a**hat GOPe chairman Rob Gleason who lobbied against it before it ever got out of committee. Had it passed, BO would have had to have spent a lot more time in Pennsylvania, hampering his ability to campaign in Ohio, Florida and Virginia.

It is inexplicable to me how Gleason still has a job after putting his own selfish power ahead of the national GOP.

How close is Michigan into making it a reality?

20 posted on 11/20/2013 9:09:14 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson