To: hometoroost
You should have been there months ago when we were interviewing for an international marketing position. Even the Ivy League dimwits couldn’t even know the difference between “lose” and “loose”.
14 posted on
11/23/2013 9:00:32 AM PST by
max americana
(fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
To: max americana; Tax-chick
Even the Ivy League dimwits couldn’t even know the difference between “lose” and “loose”.Shocking! What prevented them?
BTW, TC, you'll love this entire thread!
25 posted on
11/23/2013 9:11:15 AM PST by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: max americana
But their self-esteem was really strong and that’s what counts isn’t it?
To: max americana
Even the Ivy League dimwits couldn’t even know the difference between “lose” and “loose”.I think we're seeing evolution of the language. "Lose" becomes "Loose" in about two thirds of the usage I see.
Don't know what "Loose" evolves to; it probably won't be "Looose".
Perhaps "untight" will take the place of loose.
47 posted on
11/23/2013 9:55:35 AM PST by
Ole Okie
To: max americana
Even the Ivy League dimwits couldn’t even know the difference between “lose” and “loose”.That would also be true of a huge number of Freepers. I see it all the time.
99 posted on
11/23/2013 3:50:01 PM PST by
OldPossum
("It's" is the contraction of "it" and "is"; think about ITS implications.)
To: max americana
’ Ivy League dimwits couldn’t even know the difference between “lose” and “loose”.’
Lose is what my pants become when I loose weight...
103 posted on
11/23/2013 4:13:17 PM PST by
Delta Dawn
(Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson