If you want to refute what I show, address it technically, not lawerize hand waving that quotes what others say. No one has ever shown before John Connally's rapid movement forward and his head snap and tied it to the shot that hit him in the back. Tell me how John Connally got thrown forward immediately after JFK was shot in the head. How did he move like that? A simple back of the envelope calculation will show you that Nellie could not have thrown John forward before she pulled him over into her lap, she was not strong enough to do that.
So what happened? The audio evidence indicates a shot was fired from behind 0.7 seconds after JFK was shot in the head. We have John Connally making one of the quickest movements in the Zapruder film exactly when other independent evidence shows a shot was fired. Find one other book that shows Connally's rapid movement and ties it to the acoustical evidence showing the last shot was fired at that exact moment. Bugliosi claims he addressed all of the other "guesses" but he never seriously addresses the multitude of witnesses who say they heard BANG-BANG.
You have three things together that indicate the last two shots were fired a split second apart, BANG-BANG.
1. MANY witnesses said they heard the last two shots BANG-BANG
2. The acoustical evidence indicates the last two shots were fired 0.7 seconds apart
3. John Connally is thrown forward a split second after JFK is shot in the head starting 0.7 seconds after JFK is shot in the head.
4. John Connally says in many of the interviews he did that the blow to his back bent him over. When is he bent over? A split second AFTER JFK was shot in the head
5. John Connally turned after he first reacted after the sign to look over his right shoulder. He says he didn't see anything out of the ordinary and was turning back toward his left to look back when he was bent over.
Question to you about #5: How did Connally turn around when he had a major exit wound about the size of a baseball in his chest?
Why is there no blood on Connally's shirt from his first reaction to a shot (about Z frame 224) all the way up to JFK's head shot? You can clearly see his right wrist and his shirt. No blood? How is that possible? Nellie described the exit wound in his chest "about the size of a baseball."
The simple answer of course is that John Connally was not shot in the back until a split second after JFK was shot in the head, then it all makes sense. For that to be true, the US government had to forge, create, destroy evidence and harass witnesses. You have a huge dilemma because no one has seriously asked these question before because everyone has bought at least some of the US government's lies.
NOVA The NOVA show you reference used evidence which the US government forged to reach their conclusions. How can anybody get a right answer if they use fraudulent evidence? The US government was able to pull this off because EVERYONE else used some of the government's evidence. You probably know that the FBI confiscated all of the Dallas evidence. Obviously, if you were going to look at the possibility the US government was involved in the assassination, you would NOT be able to use any of the government's evidence. I only use evidence the US government did not or could not have forged, nobody else did that.
Here is the real bomb shell: Either the acoustical evidence is invalid OR the US government forged a massive amount of evidence and information.
It's not so bad. You were taken in by a scam just like millions before you. Now you know why George laughed at you a few years ago. He couldn't help himself:
Smiling about a deluded gunman who killed JFK
And don't forget that there is no debate that 4.8 seconds is in BOTH the Zapruder film and the acoustical analysis as the time between two of the shots. Therefore you must explain how the acoustical experts picked 4.8 seconds from random noise. What is the probability that the grassy knoll shot which had 26 identifiable echoes statistically matched the actual recording unless the sounds of the shots were actually recorded?
This paper should help you in your research.
http://www.ctka.net/thomas.pdf
There is one thing I am not telling you and it is a big part of the reason the JFK assassination "experts" ruled out the possibility that John Connally was shot in the back much later than about Z240. You need to explain that too as it is a big reason the US government was able to make Americans look like complete fools for a half century.
The US government learned how to tell huge lies a half century ago. You cannot understand US history since that time unless you understand how the lies hid the truth from Americans. It has been so easy to BS America. When Obama looked the world at the world and lied about Benghazi, he wasn't worried about the press exposing his lies. Hussein knows the press has been reduced to a pack of fools who will not cross him. In some ways, Hussein Obama has been made possible by the lies told 50 years ago.
Watch this again and cry for our country, not the fact that you and millions have been lied to.