To: Southack
I’m skeptical. The story needs more details. Why would the child need to be at least two?
4 posted on
12/01/2013 3:11:37 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: lepton
I’m skeptical. The story needs more details. Why would the child need to be at least two?
The only thing I could think of is that under Obamacare, standard treatment would be a dose of ibuprofen, which may be largely restricted to those under two.
6 posted on
12/01/2013 3:13:20 PM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: lepton
My guess would be because in a healthy infant/child, the healthcare costs for the first two years are greater due to well baby visits and immunizations.
8 posted on
12/01/2013 3:15:04 PM PST by
ebersole
To: lepton
“Why would the child need to be at least two?’”
Yes, I saw this story earlier today; it makes NO SENSE. And no explanation is given.
Who knows? I’m not saying it’s not true, but it makes no sense.
15 posted on
12/01/2013 3:22:36 PM PST by
jocon307
To: lepton
Crazy story, AND the guys wife is a pediatrician.
22 posted on
12/01/2013 3:29:43 PM PST by
nascarnation
(Wish everyone see a "Gay Kwanzaa")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson