To: dervish
4m wide? thats what 12-13 feet?
5 posted on
12/05/2013 8:52:24 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
It looks real small in that sat foto.
7 posted on
12/05/2013 8:58:14 AM PST by
shove_it
(long ago Orwell and Rand warned us of ObamaÂ’s America)
To: driftdiver
4m wide? thats what 12-13 feet?How much bigger does it need to be to be able to float into a harbor and set off a nuke?
9 posted on
12/05/2013 9:00:50 AM PST by
bayliving
To: driftdiver
Looks like a toy. It’s also a lovely azure color. It could be a minor threat if it has an AIP drive system and manned by Islamist martyer-types
15 posted on
12/05/2013 10:38:56 AM PST by
Afterguard
(Liberals will let you do anything you want, as long as it's mandatory.)
To: driftdiver
Beam measured at the waterline is deceptive for submarines. Even while surfaced the midline of the hull would be well below the surface. Given the curvature of the hull — I can believe 4M at the waterline.
16 posted on
12/05/2013 12:01:59 PM PST by
Tallguy
(between taglines...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson