On the contrary, I am sure that most paleontologists, biologists, and what have you would be in favor of continuing this research.
As long as the scientific method is consistently employed, and enough evidence is subjected to it, any scientist worth his salt should embrace the resultant findings.
Regards,
How about the assumptions through which they interpret their findings?
Will they question those? Will they “embrace” any conclusion that refutes their assumptions?
And how Evolutionists have to twist and bend that research to meet their preconceptions. I doubt it will be close to whatever "twist (if any)" Creationists have to do.