Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Does it take more space/tank size?

Safety of tank from compression/explosions?

It won’t gel like diesel will in say, Wyoming, SD, ND, Alaska, so that’s positive.

EPA will be against it as it would help the economy (EPA are 0bummer’s commie foot soldiers)

I’m all for it.

Caveat, if refineries could focus on gasoline and not diesel, wouldn’t that make gasoline cheaper as they would reduce blends as diesel is surely one cracking blend?


3 posted on 12/12/2013 6:27:06 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (“Some animals are more equal than others" - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CincyRichieRich

GTL!


4 posted on 12/12/2013 6:29:37 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

I don’t know about big trucks, but for pick up trucks the size of the tank is similar. For gas vehicles, you can run gas as well.

The explosion risks are different, as the Cong would disperse differently than liquid fuel. But the tanks are designed to withstand all conceivable impacts. Of course, nothing is 100% safe.

The performance is similar to normal fuel.

For cars, you CAN get a compressor installed in your home, but fill ups would take longer because your home natural gas would need to be compressed.

Conversions of normal vehicles are still cost prohibitive. I was close to being able to make it work, but you need to dive about 40,000 miles per year to make it work.


6 posted on 12/12/2013 6:35:20 AM PST by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
Does it take more space/tank size?

Yes.

Safety of tank from compression/explosions?

The tanks have a lot of strength due to needing to contain thousands of pounds per square inch of pressure. They are subject to more rigerous requirements for crash testing as well. Most these days are carbon fiber but metal ones have been in use on our roads for several decades.

Caveat, if refineries could focus on gasoline and not diesel, wouldn’t that make gasoline cheaper as they would reduce blends as diesel is surely one cracking blend?

I don't see this reducing any blends. Refineries are not going to be economically able to eliminate diesel production. All refining produces both. Companies spend significant money to change the ratio but it is tough to eliminate. I do know of 4 refineries that will produce all diesel but they essentially first produce some gasoline then continue to break it down into gas for heating fuel at the refinery.

15 posted on 12/12/2013 7:12:08 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

I’d rather see a trimming down of all gas blends than losing diesel. I can’t remember the numbers or exactly how it goes, but it was something where if you combine all the different blends of gas from all 50 states, you’d get like 30+ blends and supposedly 20+ of them are from California. Drop that 30+ to 3-5 and you’d surely see a drop in fuel prices.

Frickin’ EPA


16 posted on 12/12/2013 7:24:39 AM PST by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson