Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

CNG has less “firepower” than Diesel, right? I think its in the 90,000 BTU range (Therm) vs. Diesel with 140,000 BTU per gallon.


5 posted on 12/12/2013 6:30:25 AM PST by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: headstamp 2

The energy density is somewhere around 26 MJ/L for LNG vs 36MJ/L for diesel...what do you bet the conversion in the chart above is by volume? If you convert by energy density, diesel and LNG look to be priced exactly the same (or pretty close).

Also, what is keeping this company from just buying a tanker full of fuel and refueling at their warehouse?


8 posted on 12/12/2013 6:39:21 AM PST by willyd (I for one welcome our NSA overlords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2
"CNG has less “firepower” than Diesel, right? I think its in the 90,000 BTU range (Therm) vs. Diesel with 140,000 BTU per gallon."

There is a "combined cycle" engine that is purported to be MORE efficient that basic diesel. Such an engine uses both natgas and diesel. Double injectors on each cylinder. The natgas injection provides most of the BTU's for driving, and a very small amount of diesel injected retains the "compression/ignition" of the diesel and obviates the need for a spark ignition source.

I suspect that for future "big rigs" that such engines will become the drive option of choice.

13 posted on 12/12/2013 6:57:19 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson