there are 2 separate issues:
one is that the M.O. of the left should always be exposed. Their societal strata invariably consists of a powerful and wealthy elite who talk the leftist talk to insulate themselves from criticism by the underclass.
two: it should be explained, lest anyone get the wrong idea, that stripping them of their wealth is not what should be advocated. Elevating their underclass is what they should be doing, rather than promoting their victimization for contingency fees.
yes, I totally agree