Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Colonialism a Positive Force?
The New American ^ | 17 December 2013 | Selwyn Duke

Posted on 12/18/2013 7:30:18 AM PST by Paladins Prayer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: BenLurkin

DADburnit! Beat me to it!


21 posted on 12/18/2013 8:15:41 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
One thing I have found common in the third world (past colonies) is that they no concept of preventive maintenance.
Everything is OK as long as it works, but if it breaks they just abandon the thing.
22 posted on 12/18/2013 8:15:53 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
Wicked Imperialists: Roads Hospitals Schools Railroads Hygiene Churches Orphanages Literacy Harbors/Ports Books Electricity Technology

"Other than that, what have the Imperialists ever done for us?"

23 posted on 12/18/2013 8:17:52 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

I am reminded of a scene in THE MAN WHO WOULD BE KING who asks a tribal elder if they have enemies.
The man bursts out crying and tells how a tribe just up river goes out and pees in the river when his people are trying to bathe.


24 posted on 12/18/2013 8:19:06 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

What a fascinating chart! Where did you get it? (My middle-aged eyes can’t make out the source in gray at the bottom.)


25 posted on 12/18/2013 8:24:31 AM PST by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

That’s funny raht dere, don’t care who ya are.


26 posted on 12/18/2013 8:25:40 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

I think British colonialism was beneficent, and French colonialism somewhat less so, but you are choosing a poor example with the Congo and Belgian colonialism. Granted it is a cesspool today, but the record of King Leopold’s administration was murderous exploitation at its worst. It was basically a license to private companies to enslave Africans at the point of a gun for mining and rubber extraction. There was no effort to bring civilization except for fortress white enclaves.


27 posted on 12/18/2013 8:28:11 AM PST by Sicvee (Sicvee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: untenured

CIA World Factbook


28 posted on 12/18/2013 8:34:14 AM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sicvee

Admittedly, Leopold’s reign was a horrorshow example of colonial exploitation. But the independence movement didn’t start under Leopold. It began years later after European “colonizers” had brought schools, hospitals, roads, and electricity to the country. It was only then that the Congolese decided they needed to shake off the yoke of imperialism and take charge of their own destiny.

They did, and the result is the cesspool the Republic is today.

But I will not defend Leopold and his depravities.


29 posted on 12/18/2013 8:38:07 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

If only the white man would colonize Detroit.


30 posted on 12/18/2013 8:43:12 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

don’t forget pizza delivery!


31 posted on 12/18/2013 8:46:16 AM PST by ealgeone (obama, border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

What ever happened to the concept of “civilization?”

Yes, everybody needs:
Roads and Railroads
Hospitals
Schools
HYGIENE
Churches
Orphanages
Literacy
Harbors/Ports
Books
Electricity
Technology

And the greatest of these is Literacy. Otherwise, how do you pass on civilization to the next generation?


32 posted on 12/18/2013 8:46:17 AM PST by Liberty Wins ( The average lefty is synapse challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

1) To women: There are plenty of decent guys out there. Just go to any singles bar. 2) To blacks: There is no racism out there. Just ask any bigot.

To America: Are blacks better off being brought here as slaves? I think that they have too much control of their destiny just like the newly independent states. Now we can see the result.

Conclusion: there is no solution.


33 posted on 12/18/2013 8:52:03 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

I’ve heard this a number of times, including Iraqi’s, Pakistani’s, Indian’s...

The British brought:
- Railway’s and organized transportation
- Built bridges, etc.
- Institutions
- Health
- Education
- Etc.
- Changed government system, influenced democratic process.

These things were absent until they came...at least that’s what I’ve been told.


34 posted on 12/18/2013 8:54:16 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Very interesting chart. Would be interesting to see the same information plotted out as actual GDP, versus percentage of total.

IOW, did India and China actually go backwards to the extent shown, or did they just stagnate while western powers surged ahead?

Have seen other evidence that for at least 2000 years China was consistently the most technologically innovative society in the world. Till middle Ming dynasty, somewhere around 1500, which was several centuries before the West had any real impact on China. Then innovation stopped, not just in relation to the surging West, but on an absolute basis.

Never have seen a logical reason why.


35 posted on 12/18/2013 9:01:34 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist
I once knew a highly educated Indian man who immigrated to the United States. He strongly maintained that the British Empire was the best thing to ever happen to India, and India’s independence marked the beginning of its decline. I’m certain this is neither an original nor unique perspective of many Indians.

Being a Brit colony was good for the regular people, not good for the native ruling elites, which is why they wanted the Brits out.

36 posted on 12/18/2013 9:10:26 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Where online did you find the figure (not the data on which it was based) though? I am wondering if you got it from a website where there is some discussion of out. The source code only has an imgur address for the figure.


37 posted on 12/18/2013 9:15:44 AM PST by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: untenured

Oops, discussion of “it,” not “out.”


38 posted on 12/18/2013 9:17:28 AM PST by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Paladins Prayer

I once had a old woman in a Ugandan village ask me, “Please, when are the British coming back?”

A decade later an man in a village in Mali asked me, “Do you know what this country needs?”

No, I replied.

“Re-colonization!”


39 posted on 12/18/2013 9:18:32 AM PST by BwanaNdege (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. J.F. Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Once England made something of India, the Indians wanted it all without repaying the investment.

See post 10.

I have seen several studies showing British exploitation of India and its horrific affects on the economy. Problem is that the studies show all kinds of internal evidence of a predisposition to denounce imperialist exploitation. Would very much like to read a reasonably unbiased study of the pros and cons of imperialism for India.

Fairly obviously Brit colonization was disastrous for most of the rulers and nobility. But some groups surged ahead, and the peasantry benefited in many ways. So what was the net effect?

It should be remembered that colonization of India was an entirely different issue from that of Africa, Australia or (most of) the Americas. When Europeans first contacted India directly, it was enormously more wealthy, and was arguably considerably more civilized.

40 posted on 12/18/2013 9:19:53 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson