Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: navysealdad
The question that should be posed to gay activists is - what is an acceptable form of dissent from your views?

Practically speaking, we all know that the answer from their perspective is that there is no acceptable opposing viewpoint.

No one has the right to define acceptable forms of dissent for others in a free society, but those well insinuated in the media, such as gays, do it all the time by threatening or exacting economic punishment (see Paula Deen) on those who disagree with them.

19 posted on 12/18/2013 6:31:30 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wally_Kalbacken
The question that should be posed to gay activists is - what is an acceptable form of dissent from your views?

None. There is no acceptable form of dissent from their views, at least not on any channel of the mass media. FOX possibly excepted, I don't know at this point.

21 posted on 12/18/2013 6:33:59 PM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

I understand that his comments were along the lines of “homosexuality is a sin”?

If you agree with his statement, I think the appropriate response is to cancel your cable. Huh? Wait a minute...

I know it seems drastic but how else can you vote your disagreement with the suspension? Cable is a package deal.

Plus it recruits allies, the cable company and the other channels. Cancel your cable and tell them why.

I imagine that a majority of Americans agree with his statement. At some point, we have to hold the line on these attacks on free speech.

When Bloomberg wanted to limit the size of a soda, NYer’s should have sent soda sales plummeting. I bet the soda industry, distributors and retailers would have been beating down Bloomberg’s door.


37 posted on 12/18/2013 6:48:46 PM PST by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

The only acceptable form of comments concerning homosexuality for the homo groups is complete agreement with everything they stand for. They brook no disagreement whatsoever from anyone about anything they like to do. Back in the ‘80s when it was learned they condoms could halt the spread of AIDs in its tracks, the homos became upset that people would try and deny them their sexual fun...at the expense of thousands of innocents murdered by these sexual savages through tainted blood transfusions and deliberate infections by homo doctors and dentists.


80 posted on 12/18/2013 7:34:36 PM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson