[SoFloFreeper]

You know, I don’t know why every rule change not put in the law isn’t IMMEDIATELY APPEALED to one of the four SCOTUS judges who could then, I suppose, put a temporary halt to the implementation while the question is being considered.

I know there are procedures, but can’t a state AG appeal directly to the SCOTUS if the rule change (i.e. LAW change) affects his/her state detrimentally?

[Venturer]

I don’t know, I have no answer.

This is the damndest law I have ever heard of.

The President not only signed it, he has changed it time and time again.

He and Sebelius seem to be making it up as they go along.

I suppose SCOTUS could do something, but they already have 4 votes and a black mailed Chief Justice, so I don’ expect much.

[Jacquerie]

Scotus is part and parcel of the consolidated government. Their rewriting of Obamacare was just as unconstitutional as Obama’s. All three branches plus the administrative state are on the same side. The states are little more than administrative units of the consolidated government. What little sovereignty they have is at the pleasure of the masterminds.

There is no chance the masterminds in Washington will voluntarily reform the system that profits them so well.