Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/20/2013 2:03:01 PM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Oliviaforever

One a day? Wow! New Mexico was yesterday!


2 posted on 12/20/2013 2:04:18 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (A courageous man finds a way, an ordinary man finds an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

So the States don’t have the right to define marriage


3 posted on 12/20/2013 2:04:25 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (Obamacare: We told you so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

And the anarchy continues.


4 posted on 12/20/2013 2:05:02 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Do it anyway.


7 posted on 12/20/2013 2:06:32 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

The left is determined to destroy this country.


8 posted on 12/20/2013 2:08:13 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Are mixed doubles tennis matches unconstitutional too?

And men’s and women’s restrooms and locker rooms certainly must be unconstitutional. It’s a form of Jim Crow-like segregation.

I guess it’s also unconstitutional to deny men fertility drugs. Since the law cannot recognize any differences between the sexes, they must be given an equal shot at getting pregnant too.


9 posted on 12/20/2013 2:08:47 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

That 14th Amendment is certainly handy for activist judges.


10 posted on 12/20/2013 2:08:51 PM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

I still haven’t found in the U.S. Constitution or the Bill of Rights where it says that two men can marry each other. Haven’t found jack about a woman’s choice to murder her baby either. Must be some of those goofyass “progressive” things the commie libs are always coming up with. The Constitution DOES NOT ADDRESS homosexual marriage.


12 posted on 12/20/2013 2:09:11 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Merry Christmas to all my fellow Americans. "Whatever" to everybody else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever
Obama activist judge.

Pending appeal to the 10th circuit….so the matter isn’t decided yet.

Though it seems that the leftist wacko judges are intentionally sticking it to conservative Christians right before Christmas.

14 posted on 12/20/2013 2:10:15 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

It is time for the House to start bringing impeachment proceedings against these out of control federal judges and have them explain themselves before the American People. I bet a lot of this foolishness will soon get stopped.


15 posted on 12/20/2013 2:10:16 PM PST by Patriot365
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Justice Scalia laid it out in his dissent on DOMA.

The Supreme Court majority of five can’t wait to give us a Roe v. Wade to make gay marriage “the law of the land”.

It is inevitable in the next several years.


17 posted on 12/20/2013 2:10:30 PM PST by Nextrush (AFFORDABLE CARE ACT=HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY BAILOUT ACT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

If Justice Anthony Kennedy had a soul, he would realize the monster he has unleashed with his DOMA decision.


19 posted on 12/20/2013 2:11:17 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

No mention of an appeal. Typical NY Slimes selective “reporting.”


22 posted on 12/20/2013 2:12:43 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Phil Robertson for president!


28 posted on 12/20/2013 2:16:31 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

here is a thought , if those homosexuals want their sham then they can move to places like MA and stay there but we all know this is not about marriage , this is about a bigger homo agenda and closing down the first and tenth amendments.

The amount of homosexuals I;ve seen and know of who have moved out of places like CA and MA and then come south telling us all how they are married is stunning.

They are not married here and they should go back north or the west coast if they want their perverted sham


29 posted on 12/20/2013 2:16:57 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Hey judge - I declare your ruling unconstitutional. Two can play this game.


30 posted on 12/20/2013 2:17:41 PM PST by lesko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

It really would work better if Federal judges at least read the Constitution once.


33 posted on 12/20/2013 2:18:08 PM PST by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

It’s only un-Constitutional if you accept that FedGov has ANY authority to legislate in this subject.

Hint: They DON’T.

This is a State’s Rights issue.


38 posted on 12/20/2013 2:22:59 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever
Claire Wolfe, is it time yet?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

39 posted on 12/20/2013 2:23:38 PM PST by wku man (It's almost deer season, got your DEERGOGGLES on yet? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jexrnFq2fXY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever
Weren't the homos just telling us in their Windsor case that this was a STATES RIGHTS ISSUE?
48 posted on 12/20/2013 2:32:39 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson