You’ll have to get that from the former CIA Director, James Woolsey, as he’s the one who had the security clearance and knows all the details - behind the scenes and not known to the public - to be able to say that.
I’m sure you could catch him on a radio talk show one of these times.
And, by the way, Woolsey said he was able to examine the FULL RECORD on Pollard (stuff that has never been released to the public or in court) and he said that according to his access to top secret material, that Pollard was not the threat he was made out to be and should have released a long time ago.
Woolsey was adamantly opposed to Pollard's release when he was the CIA director in the Clinton administration. He doesn't know anything now that he didn't know then.
Woolsey is clearly a hack whose public statements are based entirely on who he's working for at any given time. He has no credibility in this matter at all.
Has any other CIA Director other than James Woolsey called for Pollard’s release? And does Woolsey have any business or other connections with Israel that may have something to do with his public statements? I see no groundswell in the Intelligence and Law Enforcement community to support the release of Pollard.
When Woolsey was the head of the CIA he protected Aldrich Ames, one of the worst spies in U.S. history. He BRAGGED that he would not fire anyone for it, when he couldn't protect Ames any longer. He also protected Robert Hanssen, who was not arrested until he left office.
Ames and Hanssen cost American agents lives.
In his career, Woolsey did not think ANY spy against the U.S. did ANYTHING wrong. Why should we listen to anything that traitor says.
Can you explain to me why I shouldn’t think any U.S. citizen who supports James Woolsey isn’t a sicko? Woolsey did more to damage this country than bin Laden. Do you want to post what bin Laden thinks of Pollard?