Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart

Excluding the sexual scaling of long term human evolution that would have knocked the age of consent downwards a thousand years ago, I think it’s worth, in our era, to backhand an 18 year old that’s sporting a youngling of 14 years.


90 posted on 12/31/2013 10:48:04 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric

Gene, All I can say, and history bears out, is that when ‘young’ man and women married ‘young’ the world had far fewer cases of broken homes, STDs, 27yo ‘children’ better at Skyrim than manual labor and about 10,000 other examples.

Now if you want to say such is wrong, you have about 5000 years of human evolution to dispute.

As to the arguement sure to come as ‘we live in a different society”, yes we do. One that lacks the responsibility that comes with being married young and taking that responsibility through ones life.

Seriously think about what you said. Would you go back and history and kick the ass of your own relatives? Because I assure you, whether you wish to admit it or not, less than 2-3 generations would elapse before you would need to brush up on your boxing chops. And since every person on the planet for the past 5000 years could say the same, you’d better bring the gatoraide besides.

Now I understand your revulsion for the idea of mismatched ages. I do. but history is what it is. America was built by men and women married before their 18th birthday. Period. (And not an Obama period, a real one). That’s just reality.


96 posted on 12/31/2013 10:58:02 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson