When was the last time anybody saw the New York Times make a big mistake that hurt a Democrat? They are paid Democrat liars, but they are competent paid Democrat liars. What is the point of the New York Times article? Does it show a hard working Hillary Clinton doing everything possible to save those Americans in Benghazi? Nope. The article was written to try and show that Al Qaeda wasn’t involved in the attack and murder of four Americans. How does that help Hillary in her campaign? There’s another reason for the New York Times story.
Why did Hillary and Obama use American taxpayer funded personnel, equipment, facilities and funds to overthrow the government of Libya? When were they ever great champions of freedom fighters who weren’t communist?
Look up the definition of treason. The Obama administration, as evidenced by the rollout of Obamacare, is slipshod and ignorant. Perhaps their actions with regard to Libya were slipshod and ignorant. They may have carelessly put their necks in a noose.
“...necks in a noose...?”
Make 2014 a banner year and please tell me there are 1 or more individuals in DC who have the standing, the authority and the gonads to PUT that noose around these cretins’ necks and order the trapdoor be sprung.
Please offer me a tiny ray of hope.
Yes, but...
This is a preemptive attack, to immunize Hillary in advance. Team Hillary knows this will be brought up again during her campaign. When it does, they can say this was investigated over and over again and no charges were ever brought. It's old news, done to death, and it's time to "move on"
Sound familiar? It should, Team Clinton used this strategy with Whitewater, Paula Jones, Juanita Brodderick, etc.