Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2014 4:34:13 PM PST by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: rickmichaels

Unreasonable suspicion is close enough for the feral government.


2 posted on 01/02/2014 4:42:16 PM PST by Standing Wolf (No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Whatever you do, don’t tell them you are crossing the border for “work”.


3 posted on 01/02/2014 4:43:20 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Micro SDs are your friend in hostile environments.


5 posted on 01/02/2014 4:46:33 PM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

What the frack is going on??? How in HELL can this be okay???


6 posted on 01/02/2014 4:47:11 PM PST by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

My company has a policy that no company laptops are taken out of the country. If they need a laptop I’ll give them a loaner that has no data on it.


7 posted on 01/02/2014 4:47:29 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Korman, Edward Robert
Born 1942 in New York, NY

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on October 2, 1985, to a new seat authorized by 98 Stat. 333. Confirmed by the Senate on November 1, 1985, and received commission on November 4, 1985. Served as chief judge, 2000-2007. Assumed senior status on October 25, 2007.

Education:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York, B.A., 1963
Brooklyn Law School, LL.B., 1966
New York University School of Law, LL.M., 1971

Professional Career:
Law clerk, Hon. Kenneth Keating, New York State Court of Appeals, 1966-1968
Private practice, New York City, 1968-1970, 1982-1984
Assistant U.S. attorney, Eastern District of New York, 1970-1972, 1974-1978; chief assistant U.S. attorney, 1974-1978
Assistant to the solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, 1972-1974
U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, 1978-1982
Commissioner, New York Temporary Commission of Investigation, 1983-1985
Professor, Brooklyn Law School, 1984-1985


8 posted on 01/02/2014 4:47:57 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

We need a photoshop of the twin towers in flames, one labelled “4th Amendment” and the other “2nd Amendment”.

The terrorists have won.


9 posted on 01/02/2014 4:48:39 PM PST by lightman (O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine inheritance, giving to Thy Church vict'ry o'er Her enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels
Abidor "cannot be so naive to expect that when he crosses into Syrian or Lebanese border that the contents of his computer will be immune from searches and seizures at the whim of those who work for Bashar al-Assad or Hassan Nasrallah," the judge said, referring to the president of Syria and leader of Hezbollah.

Ah, so if this can be done by a regime that the US has accused of mass murder with chemical weapons might do such a thing then it's perfectly fine for the US to do it, too. Can't wait to see VX nerve gas used at the next Occupy Wall Street rally.

11 posted on 01/02/2014 4:50:29 PM PST by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

From the article: “Korman found that the plaintiffs hadn’t shown they suffered injury that gave them standing to bring the suit. He also cited previous rulings finding that the Fourth Amendment constitutional right against unreasonable searches doesn’t apply to the government’s efforts to secure international borders from outside threats.”

Again, the ‘standing’ issue. That has become the modern day legal brick wall. What about the inherent injury that comes from having your private property searched, without probable cause? That’s not sufficient injury? This judge so rules...

Also from the article: [the plaintiff]””cannot be so naive to expect that when he crosses into Syrian or Lebanese border that the contents of his computer will be immune from searches and seizures at the whim of those who work for Bashar al-Assad or Hassan Nasrallah,” the judge said, referring to the president of Syria and leader of Hezbollah.”

So, we now rely on perceptions of actions taken (or presumed to be taken) by foreign countries and terrorist organizations as the foundation for US legal decisions?

This judge needs to be removed from the bench.


12 posted on 01/02/2014 4:52:59 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

At the border, AND WITHIN 100 MILES of the border. Where 2/3 of Americans live.


15 posted on 01/02/2014 5:01:42 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

This was an ACLU and other enemies of the US lawsuit based on some Muslim guy having lots of Hamas photos on his computer.

He was on Amtrak going to NY from Montreal where he was a graduate student at McGill in Islamic studies.

Interesting how just randomly the dude whose computer was examined had all sorts of photos of Hamas and the like.


18 posted on 01/02/2014 5:06:00 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

The Bill of Rights is dying.

HHS is trashing the First Amendment in an act of supreme evil.

BATFE is trashing the Second Amendment in an ongoing power grab.

The Third Amendment is being gently nudged from time to time, but remains the most solid because FedGov doesn’t want to encroach that far. Yet.

US Border Patrol is trashing the Fourth Amendment, probably just because they can.

The Supremes trashed the Fifth Amendment with Kelo, and with civil forfeiture, and ObamaCare is adding to that crime against our rights.

The Ninth and Tenth Amendments have been dead for decades.

It’s sad what we have allowed to happen to the freedom we were obligated to pass on to our children.


19 posted on 01/02/2014 5:06:14 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels
U.S. border agents should have the authority to search laptop computers carried by news photographers ... at international border crossings without reasonable suspicion
22 posted on 01/02/2014 5:09:07 PM PST by null and void (It is as if they all had one head. Too bad they donÂ’t all have one neck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Lets everyone bring a nonfunctioning, defunct laptop so the TSA can inspect each and every one. Lets waste their time to the max. Also, insist on a patdown: refuse the terahertz scan.


23 posted on 01/02/2014 5:09:52 PM PST by bkopto (Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

“Korman... cited previous rulings finding that the Fourth Amendment constitutional right against unreasonable searches doesn’t apply to the government’s efforts to secure international borders from outside threats.”

Appeal the case. The appeal only has to say:

“Only, they aren’t. California just issued a license to practice law to an illegal alien and as of Oh-now-thirty, the Feds haven’t arrested him”


25 posted on 01/02/2014 5:11:35 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Thought Puzzle: Describe Islam without using the phrase "mental disorder" more than four times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

How about including 100 miles from any illegal alien?


29 posted on 01/02/2014 5:30:51 PM PST by Scrambler Bob ( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Nominated by President Reagan. WTF?


33 posted on 01/02/2014 6:06:35 PM PST by beelzepug (if any alphabets are watchin', I'll be coming home right after the meetin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels
My earlier reading of the decision was that the plaintiffs lacked standing and therefor the judge was granting summary judgment with the Government.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

34 posted on 01/02/2014 6:18:31 PM PST by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

For what it’s worth, searches of this kind are focused primarily on people bringing child porn into the country on their laptops.


35 posted on 01/02/2014 6:29:21 PM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels
The pattern is emerging that nowadays, every overreach by the federal government is being approved by a federal judge somewhere.

Every single one.

Obamacare individual mandate - approved.

Challenge to presidential overrides of laws - dismissed.

Unconstitutional search of journalists at the border - approved.

Others?

-PJ

37 posted on 01/02/2014 6:37:20 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson