Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duck Dynasty to Public: ‘We Are Trayvon, Too’ (Very misleading headline)
Uptown Magazine ^ | December 30, 2013 | Charles Ellison

Posted on 01/02/2014 6:05:04 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

When cable network A&E suspended then reversed-suspended Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson, popping off a pop culture tirade that muted national concern for the millions that lost unemployment benefits over the weekend, conservatives got the perfect holiday gift: a bonus Culture War narrative for 2014.

In Duck Dynasty, Republican strategists find gold. With the GOP anxiously battling skeptical grassroots conservatives, worry mounts that the usually active base voters who don’t forget about Congressional midterms won’t turn out. As the trials and tribulations of the Affordable Care Act put Democrats’ Senate majority within striking distance of Republican electoral guns, party messaging magicians will pull every trick they can find to keep red voters fired up. The polling margins are still thin, but right now it’s looking good for Republicans given where they were in October during the government shutdown. Thanks to that trusty Healthcare.gov website – and the somewhat shitty pretentiousness of Americans who weren’t predisposed to give President Obama any elbow room for error anyway – the latest CNN/ORC poll gives the GOP a five point edge over Democrats.

Dismissive Democrats can spit, huff and spin all they want about how the election is 11 months away. But their Republican counterparts are leaving nothing to chance. That means giving restless, mostly white conservatives their very own and very white redneck version of Trayvon Martin, too. Although during this particular round no one really gets hurt – other than the bruised egos of A&E executives who had to capitulate and the painful grimace of various black and LGBT community activists who went in retreat.

Being that the Florida shooting left a sour taste with anxious conservatives who viewed the tragedy as an extension of black people’s unfair monopoly on the political martyr game, Phil Robertson’s First Amendment victimization offered the refreshing retort they’d been searching for.

We’ve been watching the build-ups to such well-scripted political side shows throughout 2013 – from uncompromising Tea Partiers willing to throw dynamite on the global economy to the whiny windbag indignation of conservative cartoons like Ted Cruz (R-TX), Rand Paul (R-KY), Sarah Palin and others. The problem is that while Congressional pissing contests and filibusters might get the rank-and-file all rednecked into a tizzy, it’s not enough to get the general public to sign on. You can’t maneuver the public conversation into a proclamation of Obama-induced reverse racism if the game is baseball.

Hence, the Phil Robertson episode presents an opening for an all-out blitz. It becomes a convenient front line for a very vicious culture messaging war that will dominate the entire 2014 Congressional midterm cycle.

Most reasonable folks might hope for a reasoned and much more productive debate about job growth and how to combat wage inequality. But leave it to conservative creek beavers to gnaw at the edges of the public forum, keeping us all entranced with bullsh*t bloviating sans bills on the kitchen table.

This gets into the real reason A&E reversed its decision: it’s the highest rated show on cable because of that half of the country aligned with the Robertson cultural paradigm. Sure: 55% on average might tolerate homosexuality – but, that’s not settling the issue when 45% don’t, according to Pew Research. That’s a pretty massive number of Americans, more than likely that chunk of the electorate which feels Duck Dynasty is the reprieve they need from a world that’s crumbling all around them.

Should A&E lose that half, they lose a show that pays their bills. Polling firm YouGov found that Duck Dynasty has a 97% reach in the public space, along with a 94% positivity score compared against a very low 37% negativity score. Branding jackpot. That includes the 31% who describe themselves as “born again Christians” and the 46% who view religion as “very important” in their life. And when you get prominent GOP politicians chiming in, you don’t want that kind of static for sure.

In the meantime, while conservative strategists busily go about brewing the perfect political storm, Robertson brilliantly stages a comeback to ensure fresh seasons of redneck hokum ad nauseum. What started off as crazy ended up gaining huge return and audience share … plus a likely contract renewal to keep the bearded empire going. If you didn’t watch Duck Dynasty before, you’re probably going to watch it now just to see what they say and do next. That’s just enough to keep the political brush fires burning through November.

*********

CHARLES D. ELLISON is a veteran political strategist and Chief Political Correspondent for UPTOWN Magazine. He is also a frequent contributor to The Root and a Chief Political Correspondent for the Philadelphia Tribune. He can be reached via Twitter @charlesdellison.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2014; duckdynasty; philrobertson; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

We might as well be Martians or insects to them.

1 posted on 01/02/2014 6:05:04 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In Duck Dynasty, Republican strategists find gold.

LOL. Are you fecesing me? Republican "strategists" hate Duck Dynasty and their fans just as much as GLAAD does.

(Translation of article) - "Jump into that Briar patch, Republicans! Don't talk about Obamacare or jobs!"

2 posted on 01/02/2014 6:10:46 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m pretty sure if I could understand what the author was talking about, I would disagree with him. He’s way too deep (or something) for a simple man like me to understand him.


3 posted on 01/02/2014 6:16:02 PM PST by jimbobfoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbobfoster

Ellison’s an example of a man frustrated by not having married a 15 or 16 year old girl who can pick his ducks.


4 posted on 01/02/2014 6:26:37 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

The author is a moron, but I don’t think sex with a minor is the answer.


5 posted on 01/02/2014 6:28:08 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I wish I had the ability to write the ultimate counter argument to ‘wealth inequality’ like this:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/maurapennington/2013/03/08/to-fix-income-inequality-the-have-nots-must-become-the-do-somethings/

Do Something!!!!


6 posted on 01/02/2014 6:30:06 PM PST by griswold3 (Post-Christian America is living on borrowed moral heritage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ok, Chuckie, I've tried three times to read through this convoluted mess of yours and still don't see the Trayvon and Phil connection.
7 posted on 01/02/2014 6:32:11 PM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Charles on his CELL Yall...and hes RIGHT DOWN the STREET form the CAPITAL too.

looks like a used car salesmen on his frst job...and given his sensitivity... insight and skill as a writer....he’d be far better suited to selling HOOPTIES in the hood.


8 posted on 01/02/2014 6:44:04 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ( a Safe..and Sane....2014 To All!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
CHARLES D. ELLISON is a veteran political strategist and Chief Political Correspondent <<

Not any more!...lol

9 posted on 01/02/2014 6:47:16 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The age for marrying with parental consent is 16 in an overwhelming majority of the United States. It is 12 in Massachusetts!


10 posted on 01/02/2014 6:52:39 PM PST by NRA1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We are all ‘Phil’!!!


11 posted on 01/02/2014 6:53:46 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“CHARLES D. ELLISON is a veteran political strategist”

I guess that explains why he’s fulla crap


12 posted on 01/02/2014 6:54:45 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRA1776

I was 2 weeks away from 16. I was not mature enough to know better.


13 posted on 01/02/2014 6:56:09 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NRA1776

That is digusting, if that is true, Massataxes should be nuked from orbit


14 posted on 01/02/2014 7:02:18 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And what he probably doesn’t know is how many blacks actually watch and like the show.


15 posted on 01/02/2014 7:06:32 PM PST by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lake Living

And the ones over 50 know exactly what he meant.


16 posted on 01/02/2014 7:08:10 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (A courageous man finds a way, an ordinary man finds an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

States allow it if the groom is within X number of years in age and the parents sign off on it. Been that way for centuries. Both of my grandmothers were 14 at their weddings.


17 posted on 01/02/2014 7:09:44 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (A courageous man finds a way, an ordinary man finds an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That is disgusting though. 12? 14?

These are children.


18 posted on 01/02/2014 7:13:37 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“States allow it”

Oh well that changes everything. lolz


19 posted on 01/02/2014 7:14:12 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Try not to judge past generations by the standards of today. Big families were needed on the farms, infant mortality was much higher than today, so a woman had to get started having babies about a day after puberty. We don’t have those conditions now, so we don’t usually have young teen girls marrying young men these days. If something happened to society where we needed large families for labor again, I assure you we’d go back to it quickly.


20 posted on 01/02/2014 7:20:33 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (A courageous man finds a way, an ordinary man finds an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson