If retail stores open to the general public are allowed to refuse service to people with “No shirt, No shoes, No service”, aren’t those stores discriminating against shirtless, shoeless people? What’s the difference here?
Being gay is not an immutable characteristic, people CHOOSE to be gay. (Show me the gay gene). If I want to stay overnight at the YWCA why can they refuse to let me just because I’m a man? Isn’t that discrimination? The Gaystopo are hypocrites.
That’s what is so untenable about homosexuality as a political cause:
If its a choice, then its not a civil rights issue.
If its genetic, then its a disease in search of a cure.
Right now, it is what it needs to be in order for the cause to get what it wants. It is having its cake, and eating its cake.
In the case of this Colorado baker in particular.
Not generally accurate, any more than choosing to be obsessive compulsive (though there are, of course, exceptions). In most cases, it's a response to very early developmental emotional damage. The choice comes when the person realizes it for what it is and either decides to combat it or embrace it. Unfortunately, the activists have successfully created a society of enablers and a cult of denial.