To: Dutchboy88
May we assume that you would prefer Hillary over Christie? That may become the showdown...
You don't get it....Chrispy Kreme was the designated loser. He wouldn't even have the same pull as Romney, running against the first woman president (the same attraction for millions of idiots who wanted to vote for the first black president).
The fix is/was in...at least now we (conservatives) have a better chance of actually having a say in the matter.
11 posted on
01/09/2014 11:25:22 AM PST by
rottndog
('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
To: rottndog
at least now we (conservatives) will have a better chance of actually having a say in the matterThink back to the November elections. The RNC gave Christie money he didn't need to boost his percentage, in preparation for a presidential run. If instead they'd supported Cuccinelli with campaign financing and advice for avoiding liberal traps for conservative candidates, we'd have Senator Cucinelli.
The puppet masters will probaly try to insert anothoer RINO fake constitutional conservative who has the blessing of the Chamber of Commerce. I don't think it's going to work anymore. This just might be the straw that broke the camel's back. We should stop being voting fodder for the elite.
13 posted on
01/09/2014 11:33:48 AM PST by
grania
To: rottndog
"The fix is/was in...at least now we (conservatives) have a better chance of actually having a say in the matter." I believe I get it. But, really, we have a "better chance"? Please enlighten us on how we conservatives are going to have a "say"...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson