This judge exposes another issue regarding a COS (Convention of States)...
One argument put forth by opponents supposedly on the RIGHT against a COS is that states should use nullification. Well, if that is so, it does not appear from the likes of this judge and his ilk that nullification would get much mileage. Next time someone tries to tell me that a COS is a disaster because nullification is the way to go, this ruling can be a centerpiece in counterpoint.
I used to be opposed to a Concon due to the threat of corruption by communists who would use it to implement some vile oppression of liberty,
but, I have since learned that before the Concon is voted on to convene, a specific agenda is laid out, limiting the scope to very specific items to be voted on - and each state has but one vote, removing the possibility of some high population liberal state overwhelming the others.