Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Cable TV is the modern day equivalent of the buggy whip.
1 posted on 01/21/2014 4:14:42 PM PST by Red in Blue PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red in Blue PA

What is Cable TV?


2 posted on 01/21/2014 4:16:44 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Well cable also provides Internet access.

Where else can you get 100 Mb connections?

I won’t part with mine.


7 posted on 01/21/2014 4:24:29 PM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

I believe there is a close connection between many cable companies and liberal politics.
Comcast owns MSNBC for example.
Time Warner owns CNN

etc

Generally when crony capitalism is involved, change won’t happen quickly.


11 posted on 01/21/2014 4:30:12 PM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

I know some people up in Brooklyn who pay over $80,000 a year for an apartment and $5000 a year for media connections. They make under $200,000 a year combined, and a huge chunk of that goes to taxes. Take away another $10,000 for their annual island vacation, and they live like paupers.


12 posted on 01/21/2014 4:30:39 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

ABC in some tiff with Time Warner cut off the video feeds for 1 week after airing. My sister loved watching her soap opera on the Iphone.

Oh well.


19 posted on 01/21/2014 4:42:09 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA
Cable TV is a vast wasteland. I gave up on it sometime ago. Something like 600 channels and almost all of it recycled garbage with tons of commercials. It's hard to surf because a lot of the channels you have to pay extra for but you have to flip through them anyhow as you toggle the channels. Very aggravating.

The last straw for me was watching "Inglourious Basterds" on AMC, I think it was. It took them four hours to show the movie because they had nearly an hour and a half of commercials in between. To add insult to injury, they even cut out or censored key parts of the movie!

That's one night of my life I'll never get back.

I basically stick to Netflix now. Either through my MacBook Pro (phenomenal picture) or through my Roku when I want it on the TV. Sure, your choices are limited on Netflix with respect to movies but most of the popular TV series are on there and you can watch them at your leisure. So what if they are a season behind. I'm still working my way through "Lost" even though it left the air years ago.

Even if you wait a month to finish an episode of say, "Breaking Bad" - it will be sitting for you right where you left off. And if you want to go back to the beginning to see the episode or entire season once again - go for it!

On demand is the way to go and if cable TV doesn't change their business model, they will eventually go the way of the record industry - which is now owned by Apple, Google and Amazon.

20 posted on 01/21/2014 4:44:06 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

$250 a month is obscene.


27 posted on 01/21/2014 4:52:41 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

I am surprised that my cable company spends a lot advertising their On Demand, but the contents are slight for most channels.

I prefer On Demand because I can start and stop programs when I want.

More and more, channels are offering their programs On Line. Some require viewers to sign on through their cable provider, however.


28 posted on 01/21/2014 4:54:51 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

Amazon Developing A “TV Killer” Live Broadcast Service For The Net‏

The Wall Street Journal already discovered that Amazon have a Roku-like set top box in the works, and now they’ve followed through with some details of what the device will get to carry.

According to their latest report, Amazon are brokering deals for live TV content, wanting to secure the channels of “three big media conglomerates.”

In effect, it would be cable TV but delivered over the internet. I’m assuming it would be provided on a similar basis to Amazon’s current on-demand subscription service, which is to say, bundled with the annual Prime shipping deal.

Supposing those “three big media conglomerates” are on a par with Disney, Viacom, NBCUniversal or Fox then this service could well lure a lot of folk away from cable and into Amazon’s arms.

It’s a trend that’s already started, it would seem, with NPD reporting a 4% increase in American households subscribing to Netflix, Amazon Prime or Hulu Plus services between march 2012 and August 2013 while, concurrently, the percentage of cable subscriptions dipped by 6%.

29 posted on 01/21/2014 4:56:12 PM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red in Blue PA

I’m not sure this is a good move for Intel. OTOH, cash in the hand.....


30 posted on 01/21/2014 5:20:39 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson