Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captainpaintball

That is a complete whitewash.

A) Standing with GLAAD, a cultural terrorist organization, is bad enough. This is a CPUSA front group.

B) Russian actor, and why did he bother bringing something up that nobody had even heard about just to push GLAAD’s victimhood agenda?

C) He tied it all in to Russia’s new laws, even recently with his critique of Putin’s interview. He then decried the ‘anti-gay’ crowd, CUOMO’S LANGUAGE

Talk about having no principles.


112 posted on 01/22/2014 8:31:39 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Viennacon
That is a complete whitewash.

How is it a whitewash? I saw the original video, and I am of the understanding you did not. What are your your sources, again?

A) Standing with GLAAD, a cultural terrorist organization, is bad enough. This is a CPUSA front group.

I am telling you, (since I SUBSCRIBE TO THE BLAZE, AND YOU DO NOT--Again, what are your sources, then, for your blog post) that his 'defense' of GLADD is his way of telling his audience that in Russia, it has come to the point where an entertainer there feels safe enough to call for the death (by burning them alive) of homosexuals. And there is no official condemnation of this by the government, like there would be here, if said. And when you say Glenn is supporting communists, remember the source of all of this is Russia/USSR after all... If you are OK with this actor's statement, because it is a group you don't like, you are making a mistake.That is his point.

B) Russian actor, and why did he bother bringing something up that nobody had even heard about just to push GLAAD’s victimhood agenda?

That nobody? (forgive the caps, but...) THAT NOBODY IS THE WHOLE POINT OF GLENN SAYING THAT HE WILL "STAND WITH" GLADD OVER HIS "BURN GAYS ALIVE" STATEMENT. If the "nobody" never would have opened his mouth, Glenn would have talked about something else entirely! Where else is there evidence of Glenn "standing with" GLADD?

C) He tied it all in to Russia’s new laws, even recently with his critique of Putin’s interview. He then decried the ‘anti-gay’ crowd, CUOMO’S LANGUAGE.

Remember, I saw the video. I am not sure what you are saying here, but if I am correct, you are telling me that if Glenn "decrying" the "anti-gay crowd" is using Cuomo's Language? I am losing you--I don't remember him saying that if you do not support GLADD, "There is no place for you in New York. Or America for that matter. (that is ACTUAL cuomo language.) Unless you think that there IS a place in Russia, and in America, for groups of any kind to be put into ovens. Alive.

132 posted on 01/23/2014 1:26:30 AM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson