To: Academiadotorg
I saw an attempt to validate the Phillips Curve in one of my professional journals. The graph accompanying the article displayed unemployment vs. inflation, and the author fitted a curve to the data. The intent was to show that higher inflation was correlated with lower unemployment. Phillips himself never said there was any causality between the two, only a correlation. Actually the correlation was pretty poor. The data points were scattered all over the graph, and the regression fit had a fairly low correlation coefficient. However, because it supported Keynesianism, it received a great deal of support among economists and politicians. I don't think anyone takes the Phillips Curve seriously any longer.
6 posted on
02/06/2014 12:12:11 PM PST by
JoeFromSidney
(Book: Resistance to Tyranny. Buy from Amazon.)
To: JoeFromSidney
Yep, Keynes ignored key concepts such as productivity and substitution, two things libs don’t understand...
8 posted on
02/06/2014 12:54:26 PM PST by
fatez
("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson